Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate whether focal attention can be guided by an analysis of the emotional expression in a face. Participants searched displays of 7, 11, 15, and 19 schematic faces for the location of a unique face expressing either a positive or a negative emotion located among distractor faces expressing a neutral emotion. The slopes of the search functions for locating the negative face were shallower than the slopes of the search functions for locating the positive face (Experiments 1A and 2A). When the faces were inverted to reduce holistic face perception, the slopes of the search functions for locating positive and negative faces were not different (Experiments 1B and 2B). The results suggest that the emotional expression in a face can be perceived outside the focus of attention and can guide focal attention to the location of the face.

[1]  W. Köhler.  Dynamics in Psychology , 1940 .

[2]  G. Sackett.  Monkeys Reared in Isolation with Pictures as Visual Input: Evidence for an Innate Releasing Mechanism , 1966, Science.

[3]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study , 1967 .

[4]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[5]  D. Cüceloğlu.  Perception of Facial Expressions in Three Different Cultures , 1970 .

[6]  Stuart J. Mckelviet.  The meaningfulness and meaning of schematic faces , 1973 .

[7]  D. Homa,et al.  Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Izard,et al.  The 5-month-old's ability to discriminate facial expressions of emotion , 1985 .

[10]  Dean G. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect , 1986 .

[11]  D. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Aronoff,et al.  The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Purcell,et al.  Probing "pop-out": Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. , 1989 .

[16]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  B. Julesz,et al.  Context Superiority in a Detection Task with Line-Element Stimuli: A Low-Level Effect , 1990, Perception.

[18]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[20]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  R. Desimone.  Face-Selective Cells in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[23]  H. Nothdurft.  Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[24]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Automatic Emotion: Attention and Facial Efference , 1994 .

[27]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[28]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. , 1994 .

[30]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .

[31]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection. , 1995 .

[32]  Murray White,et al.  Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion , 1995 .

[33]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  8. Extending guided search: why guided search needs a preattentive "item map" , 1996 .

[35]  Anger recognition is independent of spatial attention. , 1996 .

[36]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The emotional brain , 1996 .

[37]  D. Purcell,et al.  It Takes a Confounded Face to Pop Out of a Crowd , 1996, Perception.

[38]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Stenberg,et al.  Judging Words at Face Value: Interference in a Word Processing Task Reveals Automatic Processing of Affective Facial Expressions , 1998 .

[40]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Dolan,et al.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala , 1998, Nature.

[42]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Does unattended information facilitate change detection? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Mack.  Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .