Life in the Fast Lane

Research has repeatedly demonstrated the positive effects of acceleration for gifted and talented students. This study expands the literature by not only evaluating the impact of early grade skipping on high school and college outcomes but also examining the role of postacceleration opportunities on subsequent performance. Using a representative national sample, accelerated students were compared with older grade-level peers who had similar academic and demographic backgrounds. Results suggest that, on average, accelerated students consistently and significantly outperformed their nonaccelerated peers, both in high school and in college. Furthermore, postacceleration educational opportunities provided additional benefit; students who skipped a grade and also participated in challenging academic programs (e.g., Advanced Placement, high-ability instructional groups) demonstrated particularly high achievement. Results suggest that gifted learners profit most when acceleration is coupled with additional opportunities for advanced study.

[1]  S. M. Moon,et al.  The Effects of Acceleration on High-Ability Learners: A Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Ina V. S. Mullis,et al.  TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. , 2012 .

[3]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Accelerated Instruction on Students , 1984 .

[4]  S. Assouline,et al.  A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. , 2004 .

[5]  S. Assouline,et al.  Iowa Acceleration Scale Manual: A Guide for Whole-Grade Acceleration K-8. (3rd Edition, Manual). , 2009 .

[6]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Advanced Placement’s Role in Developing Exceptional Human Capital , 2004 .

[7]  D. Lubinski,et al.  When Less Is More: Effects of Grade Skipping on Adult STEM Productivity Among Mathematically Precocious Adolescents , 2013 .

[8]  G. King,et al.  Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding , 2011 .

[9]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Who Rises to the Top? Early Indicators , 2013, Psychological science.

[10]  S. Pressey,et al.  Educational acceleration : appraisals and basic problems , 1949 .

[11]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[12]  William F. Tate,et al.  Race-Ethnicity, SES, Gender, and Language Proficiency Trends in Mathematics Achievement: An Update , 1997 .

[13]  I. Mullis,et al.  TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. , 2012 .

[14]  Taisir Subhi Yamin,et al.  Giftedness 101 , 2012 .

[15]  Maureen A. Marron,et al.  What Factors Are Associated With Grade Acceleration?: An Analysis and Comparison of Two U.S. Databases , 2009 .

[16]  R. Subotnik,et al.  Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education : A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science , 2011 .

[17]  Paul M. Janos.  A Fifty-Year Follow-up of Terman's Youngest College Students and IQ-Matched Agemates , 1987 .

[18]  N. Robinson,et al.  The Performance of Students in a Program of Radical Acceleration at the University Level , 1985 .

[19]  G. King,et al.  Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching , 2012, Political Analysis.

[20]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Five Years of Early Entrants: Predicting Successful Achievement in College , 1990 .