The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence?

Background and Purpose— In the Western world, the Bobath Concept or neurodevelopmental treatment is the most popular treatment approach used in stroke rehabilitation, yet the superiority of the Bobath Concept as the optimal type of treatment has not been established. This systematic review of randomized, controlled trials aimed to evaluate the available evidence for the effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in stroke rehabilitation. Method— A systematic literature search was conducted in the bibliographic databases MEDLINE and CENTRAL (March 2008) and by screening the references of selected publications (including reviews). Studies in which the effects of the Bobath Concept were investigated were classified into the following domains: sensorimotor control of upper and lower limb; sitting and standing, balance control, and dexterity; mobility; activities of daily living; health-related quality of life; and cost-effectiveness. Due to methodological heterogeneity within the selected studies, statistical pooling was not considered. Two independent researchers rated all retrieved literature according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale from which a best evidence synthesis was derived to determine the strength of the evidence for both effectiveness of the Bobath Concept and for its superiority over other approaches. Results— The search strategy initially identified 2263 studies. After selection based on predetermined criteria, finally, 16 studies involving 813 patients with stroke were included for further analysis. There was no evidence of superiority of Bobath on sensorimotor control of upper and lower limb, dexterity, mobility, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Only limited evidence was found for balance control in favor of Bobath. Because of the limited evidence available, no best evidence synthesis was applied for the health-related quality-of-life domain and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions— This systematic review confirms that overall the Bobath Concept is not superior to other approaches. Based on best evidence synthesis, no evidence is available for the superiority of any approach. This review has highlighted many methodological shortcomings in the studies reviewed; further high-quality trials need to be published. Evidence-based guidelines rather than therapist preference should serve as a framework from which therapists should derive the most effective treatment.

[1]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Recovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes? , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: A systematic review of available evidence , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  S. Raine.  The current theoretical assumptions of the Bobath concept as determined by the members of BBTA , 2007, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[6]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  Disentangling the contribution of the paretic and non-paretic ankle to balance control in stroke patients , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[8]  A. Geurts,et al.  Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  B. Kollen,et al.  Recovery of gait after stroke , 2006 .

[10]  S. Raine.  Defining the Bobath concept using the Delphi technique. , 2006, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[11]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Anterior-Posterior Ground Reaction Forces as a Measure of Paretic Leg Contribution in Hemiparetic Walking , 2006, Stroke.

[12]  J. Duysens,et al.  Gait recovery is not associated with changes in the temporal patterning of muscle activity during treadmill walking in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of visual feedback therapy on postural control in bilateral standing after stroke: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting Improvement in Gait After Stroke: A Longitudinal Prospective Study , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Back Schools for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2005, Spine.

[16]  Z. Huang,et al.  Effects of problem-oriented willed-movement therapy on motor abilities for people with poststroke cognitive deficits. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[17]  I. Miyai,et al.  Patients with Severe Stroke Benefit Most by Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Team Approach , 2005, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[18]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Coordination of Hemiparetic Locomotion after Stroke Rehabilitation , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  T Platz,et al.  Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  T. Platz,et al.  Impairment–oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[21]  B. Dobkin.  Rehabilitation after Stroke , 2005 .

[22]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[23]  Ray-Yau Wang,et al.  Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Dobkin.  Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  A. Moseley.  Treadmill training more effective than Bobath training in improving walking following stroke. , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[26]  A. Sterr,et al.  Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies , 2004, Neurology.

[27]  M. Stokes.  Physical Management in Neurological Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[28]  Areerat Suputtitada,et al.  Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[29]  B. Gialanella,et al.  Spalla dolorosa dell'emiplegico: Effetti di un programma di esercizi secondo Bobath , 2004 .

[30]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[31]  Dale Corbett,et al.  Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  S Hesse,et al.  Aerobic treadmill plus Bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[33]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[34]  Kim Brock,et al.  Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[35]  Luciano Fasotti,et al.  Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  M. Röther,et al.  [The Bobath concept today: still appropiate yesterday--a nursing error today?]. , 2004, Pflege Zeitschrift.

[37]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Anticipatory postural adjustment in selected trunk muscles in post stroke hemiparetic patients. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  Ben Xu,et al.  [Effects of early rehabilitation on activities of daily living and complications in acute stroke patients]. , 2004, Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences.

[39]  S. Lennon.  Chapter 21 – The theoretical basis of neurological physiotherapy , 2004 .

[40]  B. Gialanella,et al.  [The painful hemiplegic shoulder: effects of exercises program according to Bobath]. , 2004, La Clinica terapeutica.

[41]  H. Diener,et al.  The coordination of posture and voluntary movement in patients with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[42]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[43]  K. J. Miller,et al.  Recovery of standing balance and functional mobility after stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  Catherine Sherrington,et al.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[45]  Birgitta Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A follow-up one and four years post stroke , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[46]  J. Howle.  Neuro-developmental treatment approach : theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice , 2003 .

[47]  M. Paci.  Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex , 2002, Nature.

[49]  Ichiro Miyai,et al.  Long-term effect of body weight-supported treadmill training in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  Eric Vicaut,et al.  Perception of Verticality After Recent Cerebral Hemispheric Stroke , 2002, Stroke.

[51]  J. Eng,et al.  Reliability and comparison of weight-bearing ability during standing tasks for individuals with chronic stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[53]  M. H. Mudie,et al.  Training symmetry of weight distribution after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing task-related reach, Bo bath and feedback training approaches , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[54]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effect of duration of upper- and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[55]  J. P. Paul,et al.  The effect of independent practice of motor tasks by stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[56]  A Ashburn,et al.  Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a survey within the UK. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[57]  P. van Vliet,et al.  Comparison of the content of two physiotherapy approaches for stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[58]  J R Jenner,et al.  Changing patterns of postural hip muscle activity during recovery from stroke , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[59]  B. Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[60]  A Ashburn,et al.  The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[61]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[62]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[63]  B. Koes,et al.  The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. , 1999, Spine.

[64]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[65]  M. Thaut,et al.  Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[66]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation , 1996 .

[67]  D. Good,et al.  Comparison of Two Therapy Approaches in the Rehabilitation of the Pure Motor Hemiparetic Stroke Patient , 1995 .

[68]  S. Laursen,et al.  [Intensive rehabilitation after apoplexy--a controlled pilot study]. , 1995, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[69]  M Hallett,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[70]  A. Geurts,et al.  Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in the quantification of postural control. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[71]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[72]  An evaluation of the hemiplegic patient based on the Bobath approach: a reliability study. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[73]  O G Meijer,et al.  The transfer of scanning training effects in visual inattention after stroke: five single-case studies. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[74]  Marsha Johnson-Schmid,et al.  Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment (3rd ed.) , 1991 .

[75]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[76]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Stroke--1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. , 1989, Stroke.

[77]  J. Carr.  Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation , 1987 .

[78]  J. Basmajian,et al.  Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[79]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Adapting human postural reflexes following localized cerebrovascular lesion: Analysis of bilateral long latency responses , 1986, Brain Research.

[80]  Robert John Zagar,et al.  Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[81]  E. Hamrin.  II. Early activation in stroke: does it make a difference? , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[82]  E. Keshner,et al.  Reevaluating the theoretical model underlying the neurodevelopmental theory. A literature review. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[83]  B. Bobath.  Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[84]  Hugh Jolly,et al.  Clinics in Developmental Medicine , 1965 .