The Political Economy of Occupational Family Policies: Comparing Workplaces in Britain and Germany

With a shift in the political debate to more market-driven social policy approaches during the past decade, politicians in a number of European countries have argued that employers should take on greater responsibilities in the provision of social policy. But why should employers get involved? After reviewing the relevant literature on firm-level social policy, we analyse the conditions and causal pathways that lead to their provision. Our findings show that (i) the skill structure and level of the workforce are important conditions for firm-level engagement; (ii) employers have usually been the ‘protagonists’; (iii) the role of unions has been more limited — in Germany they can largely be characterized as ‘consenters’, whereas in Britain, their impact is negligible; (iv) in accordance with the specific systems of industrial relations, the design in Germany very much follows the concept of social partnership; in Britain the design is usually based on unilateral management decisions; and (v) based on these conditions and causal pathways, ‘enclave social policy’ is the likely result of the expansionary policy development, although in Germany, these policies have the potential of becoming an element of ‘industrial citizenship’.

[1]  J. Glass,et al.  Employer Characteristics and the Provision of Family Responsive Policies , 1995 .

[2]  John W. Budd,et al.  Family-Friendly Work Practices in Britain: Availability and Perceived Accessibility , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[4]  M. Seeleib-Kaiser Welfare State Transformations , 2008 .

[5]  Jacob S. Hacker The divided welfare state: The bat-tle over public and private social benefits in the United States , 2002 .

[6]  M. Shalev The privatization of social policy? : occupational welfare and the welfare state in America, Scandinavia and Japan , 1997 .

[7]  Margarita Estévez-Abe Gender Bias in Skills and Social Policies: The Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on Sex Segregation , 2005 .

[8]  Herwig Immervoll,et al.  Can Parents Afford to Work? Childcare Costs, Tax-Benefit Policies and Work Incentives , 2006 .

[9]  Howard Burton,et al.  Fringe Benefits , 2020, Science and Pseudoscience.

[10]  A. Elkins Toward A Positive Theory of Corporate Social Involvement , 1977 .

[11]  J. Lewis,et al.  Work/Family Balance Policies in the UK since 1997: A New Departure? , 2007, Journal of Social Policy.

[12]  J. Lewis Gender and Welfare in Modern Europe , 2006 .

[13]  Which British employers have family-friendly policies ? An analysis of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey , 2001 .

[14]  J. Evans Firms' Contribution to the Reconciliation between Work and Family Life , 2001 .

[15]  G. Esping‐Andersen,et al.  The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1990 .

[16]  Peter Swenson Capitalists Against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden , 2002 .

[17]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[18]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom. , 1963 .

[19]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Keys to action: Understanding differences in organizations' responsiveness to work‐and‐family issues , 1992 .

[20]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[21]  J. Clasen,et al.  Reforming European welfare states : Germany and the United Kingdom compared , 2007 .

[22]  Sanford M. Jacoby,et al.  Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism since the New Deal , 1997 .

[23]  L. Dickens The Business Case for Women′s Equality , 1994 .

[24]  Jane Stevens,et al.  The second work-life balance study : results from the employees’ survey , 2004 .

[25]  Fiona Neathey,et al.  The third work-life balance employee survey : main findings , 2007 .

[26]  B. Keller,et al.  Employment relations in Germany , 2011 .

[27]  T. H. Marshall Sociology at the crossroads and other essays , 1965 .

[28]  Walther Müller-Jentsch Germany: From Collective Voice to Co-management , 1995 .

[29]  J. Lewis Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes , 1992 .

[30]  Lawrence S. Root,et al.  Fringe benefits : social insurance in the steel industry , 1984 .

[31]  M. Seeleib-Kaiser Welfare state transformations : comparative perspectives , 2008 .

[32]  J. Budd,et al.  Trade Unions and Family-Friendly Policies in Britain , 2004 .

[33]  B. Jansson The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. By Jacob S. Hacker. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. xvi, 447 pp. Cloth, $55.00, isbn 0-521-81288-7. Paper, $23.00, isbn 0-521-01328-3.) , 2004 .

[34]  T. Luca,et al.  The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[35]  Cathie J. Martin,et al.  Stuck in Neutral: Business and the Politics of Human Capital Investment Policy , 1999 .

[36]  F. Block,et al.  Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies , 2001 .

[37]  J. Goodstein,et al.  Employer involvement in eldercare: an organizational adaptation perspective. , 1995, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[38]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[39]  M. Seeleib-Kaiser,et al.  The Dual Transformation of the German Welfare State , 2004 .

[40]  P. Taylor-Gooby New Risks, New Welfare , 2004 .

[41]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis. , 2005 .

[42]  L. D. Menezes,et al.  Family‐Friendly Management in Great Britain: Testing Various Perspectives , 2003 .

[43]  Jane E. Dutton,et al.  Understanding Organizational Adaptation to Change: The Case of Work-Family Issues , 1992 .

[44]  P. Taylor-Gooby New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State , 2004 .

[45]  Peter Swenson Capitalists against Markets , 2002 .

[46]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  New Hope or False Dawn? , 2001 .

[47]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[48]  M. Daly,et al.  Gender and the Welfare State: Care, Work and Welfare in Europe and the USA , 2003 .

[49]  Torben Iversen Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare , 2005 .

[50]  J. Goodstein Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues , 1994 .

[51]  Traute Meyer,et al.  When Do Benevolent Capitalists Change Their Mind? Explaining the Retrenchment of Defined-benefit Pensions in Britain , 2005 .

[52]  Paul Osterman,et al.  Work Family Programs and the Employment Relationship , 1995 .

[53]  L. den Dulk,et al.  Work-family arrangements in organisations: a cross-national study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden , 2001 .

[54]  Torben Iversen,et al.  Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state , 2001 .

[55]  S. Lewis Restructuring workplace cultures: the ultimate work‐family challenge? , 2001 .

[56]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[57]  Jane Lewis The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care , 2001 .

[58]  M. Rein,et al.  Rethinking the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Pension Reform , 2004 .

[59]  Georg Vobruba Der wirtschaftliche Wert der Sozialpolitik , 1989 .

[60]  W. Korpi,et al.  Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists , 2006 .

[61]  G. Esping-Andersen Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power , 1985 .