The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.

Reduction of the range of motion (ROM) until prosthetic impingement of a total hip replacement may lead to frequent impingement, subluxation and dislocation especially for patients with good hip movement. The ROM until prosthetic impingement can be calculated using the technical ROM (theta) and the cup and neck positions by a previously created mathematical formula. A larger (theta) with proper cup and neck positions results in a larger ROM. However there was only one paper written in English, which revealed the optimum theoretical combination of cup and neck anteversions. ROM of more than 110 degrees flexion, 30 degrees internal-rotation at 90 degrees flexion, 30 degrees extension and 40 degrees external-rotation were defined as the criteria for essential ROM for ADL. The safe-zones for combined cup anteversion (betaanat) and neck anteversion (b) were defined as the areas that fulfill all the criteria of ROM without prosthetic impingement. The safe-zones were created for 35 degrees , 45 degrees and 55 degrees cup abductions (alpha) and for 120 degrees and 135 degrees (theta). The safe-zones for combined (betaanat) and (b) were much larger for a 135 degrees (theta) than a 120 degrees (theta). Their safe-zones showed that (b) should be reduced if (betaanat) is increased and choosing a lower (alpha) requires that the sum of (betaanat) and (b) should be higher and vice versa. A (theta) of more than 135 degrees is recommended as it further increases the size of the safe-zone and provides a larger ROM, and the optimum values of combined cup and neck anteversions can be estimated by the formula: (alpha) + (betaanat) + 0.77(b) = 84.3.

[1]  B. Jolles,et al.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  D. McCollum,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Philip C. Noble,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Component Head Size on Posterior Dislocation of the Artificial Hip Joint* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  B Jaramaz,et al.  Image Guided Navigation System to Measure Intraoperatively Acetabular Implant Alignment , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  U P Wyss,et al.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J. Charnley,et al.  Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  A. Cotten,et al.  Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup , 2001, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[10]  W H Harris,et al.  Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  P. Pellicci,et al.  Dislodgment of Polyethylene Liners in First and Second-Generation Harris-Galante Acetabular Components: A Report of Eighteen Cases , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  F. Kummer,et al.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  L.-j. Yuan,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  J. Olsen,et al.  Causes and Prevention , 1991, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[15]  K. Soffe,et al.  Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  M. Seki,et al.  Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer‐aided design simulation , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. Robinson,et al.  Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  T. Wright,et al.  Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  Johnston Rc,et al.  Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. , 1970 .

[22]  M. Maynard,et al.  Modern technique of cemented total hip arthroplasty , 1991 .

[23]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  B. Zurfluh,et al.  Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Computer Assisted Measurement of Cup Placement in Total Hip Replacement , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  W H Harris,et al.  Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.