The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax.

The relation between prosody and syntax is investigated here by tracing the emergence of each in a new language, Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. We analyze the structure of narratives of four signers of this language: two older second generation signers, and two about 15 years younger. We find that younger signers produce prosodic cues to dependency between semantically related constituents, e.g., the two clauses of conditionals, revealing a type and degree of complexity in their language that is not frequent in that of the older pair. In these younger signers, several rhythmic and (facial) intonational cues are aligned at constituent boundaries, indicating the emergence of a grammatical system. There are no overt syntactic markers (such as complementizers) to relate clauses; prosody is the only clue. But this prosodic complexity is matched by syntactic complexity inside propositions in the younger signers, who are more likely to use pronouns as abstract grammatical markers of arguments, and to combine predicates with their arguments within in a constituent. As the prosodic means emerge for identifying constituent types and signaling dependency relations between them, the constituents themselves become increasingly complex. Finally, our study shows that the emergence of grammatical complexity is gradual.

[1]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Cilticization and Prosodic Words in a Sign Language , 1999 .

[2]  A. Woodward,et al.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[4]  Irit Meir,et al.  Body as subject1 , 2007, Journal of Linguistics.

[5]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing , 2006 .

[6]  U Bellugi,et al.  Neuropsychological Studies of Linguistic and Affective Facial Expressions in Deaf Signers , 1999, Language and speech.

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[8]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[9]  U. Bellugi,et al.  A comparison of sign language and spoken language , 1972 .

[10]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. , 2000 .

[11]  Peter V. Paul,et al.  Reading and Deaf Children. , 2002 .

[12]  Charlotte Baker-Shenk,et al.  A Microanalysis of the Nonmanual Components of Questions in American Sign Language , 1983 .

[13]  Irit Meir,et al.  Morphological universals and the sign language type , 2005 .

[14]  U. Kleinhenz.  Interfaces in Phonology , 1996 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[16]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Faces: The Relationship Between Language and Affect , 1990 .

[17]  益子 真由美.  Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[18]  Scott K. Liddell.  Head Thrust in ASL Conditional Marking , 2013 .

[19]  C. Bartels,et al.  The Intonation of English Statements and Questions: A Compositional Interpretation , 1999 .

[20]  Paul G. Dudis.  Body partitioning and real-space blends , 2004 .

[21]  W. Sandler,et al.  Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language , 2009, Language and speech.

[22]  W. Labov.  The social motivation of a sound change , 1963 .

[23]  Fred Karlsson,et al.  Slr '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research : Lappeenranta, Finland July 15-19, 1987 , 1993 .

[24]  Willem Elias,et al.  Signs of the Time , 1997 .

[25]  Anne Christophe,et al.  Selecting word order: the Rhytmic Activation Principle , 1996 .

[26]  Irit Meir,et al.  Sign languages and compounding , 2010 .

[27]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  The medium and the message prosodic: Interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[28]  T. Alan Hall,et al.  Studies on the phonological word , 1999 .

[29]  S. Goldin-Meadow.  The Resilience of Language : What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language , 2005 .

[30]  Ronnie B. Wilbur.  A Functional Journey with a Formal Ending: What do brow raises do in American Sign Language? , 1999 .

[31]  David M. Perlmutter,et al.  Hypothesis A/hypothesis B : linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter , 2010 .

[32]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[33]  Ronnie B. Wilbur.  A Functional Journey with a Formal Ending , 1999 .

[34]  Elisabeth Selkirk.  The Syntax‐Phonology Interface , 2011 .

[35]  Patricia Siple,et al.  Understanding language through sign language research , 1978 .

[36]  R. Jackendoff.  On Larson's treatment of the double object construction , 1990 .

[37]  Petra Eccarius,et al.  Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (review) , 2011 .

[38]  Virginia Volterra,et al.  From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children , 1990 .

[39]  Bencie Woll,et al.  The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction , 1999 .

[40]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Phonology , phonetics and the nondominant hand , 2005 .

[41]  Irit Meir,et al.  The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language , 2011, Natural language & linguistic theory.

[42]  Donna Jo Napoli,et al.  Limitations on simultaneity in sign language , 2010 .

[43]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1991, CL.

[44]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 2004 , 2005 .

[45]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Bengali intonational phonology , 1991 .

[46]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[47]  Scott K. Liddell.  American Sign Language Syntax , 1981 .

[48]  M. Aronoff,et al.  The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology , 2005, Language.

[49]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication. , 1992 .

[50]  J. Kegl.  Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[51]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[52]  Cecile McKee.  The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (review) , 2001 .

[53]  W. Sandler.  A sonority cycle in American Sign Language , 1993, Phonology.

[54]  Irit Meir,et al.  Sign Languages: The grammar of space in two new sign languages , 2010 .

[55]  Carol A. Padden,et al.  Against all expectations : Encoding subjects and objects in a new language , 2007 .

[56]  Michael Darnell.  Functionalism and formalism in linguistics , 1999 .

[57]  W. Labov.  The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[58]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Prosody and Syntax in Sign Languages. , 2010, Transactions of the Philological Society. Philological Society.

[59]  W. Sandler.  Prosody in Two Natural Language Modalities * , 1999 .

[60]  Michel DeGraff.  Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development , 2001 .

[61]  T. Givon,et al.  From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy in Discourse and Syntax. , 1979 .

[62]  M. Nespor,et al.  Prosody in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[63]  W. Sandler.  Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language , 2009, Semiotica.

[64]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[65]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  Re(e)volving Complexity: Adding Intonation , 2008 .

[66]  Irit Meir,et al.  A Language in Space: The Story of Israeli Sign Language , 2007 .

[67]  Carol Neidle,et al.  The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure , 1999 .

[68]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[69]  C. Padden,et al.  The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  U. Bellugi,et al.  The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: Grammaticized facial expressions , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.