Fully automated QRS area measurement for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to CRT. Currently employed criteria for selection of patients for this therapy (QRS duration and morphology) have several shortcomings. QRS area was recently shown to provide superior association with CRT response. However, its assessment was not fully automated and required the presence of an expert. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to develop a fully automated method for the assessment of vector-cardiographic (VCG) QRS area from electrocardiographic (ECG) signals. METHODS Pre-implantation ECG recordings (N = 864, 695 left-bundle-branch block, 589 men) in PDF files were converted to allow signal processing. QRS complexes were found and clustered into morphological groups. Signals were converted from 12‑lead ECG to 3‑lead VCG and an average QRS complex was built. QRS area was computed from individual areas in the X, Y and Z leads. Practical usability was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots and 5-year follow-up data. RESULTS The automatically calculated QRS area values were 123 ± 48 μV.s (mean values and SD), while the manually determined QRS area values were 116 ± 51 ms; the correlation coefficient between the two was r = 0.97. The automated and manual methods showed the same ability to stratify the population (hazard ratios 2.09 vs 2.03, respectively). CONCLUSION The presented approach allows the fully automatic and objective assessment of QRS area values. SIGNIFICANCE Until this study, assessing QRS area values required an expert, which means both additional costs and a risk of subjectivity. The presented approach eliminates these disadvantages and is publicly available as part of free signal-processing software.

[1]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[2]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Why QRS Duration Should Be Replaced by Better Measures of Electrical Activation to Improve Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[3]  A. Sittig,et al.  Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods. , 1990, European heart journal.

[4]  T‐Wave Area Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  Robust multichannel QRS detection , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[6]  S. Solomon,et al.  Long-Term Survival of Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block Who Are Hypo-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2013, Circulation.

[8]  I. V. Van Gelder,et al.  Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  I. V. Van Gelder,et al.  QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  P. Tchou,et al.  Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[11]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  Multichannel QRS Morphology Clustering - Data Preprocessing for Ultra-High-Frequency ECG Analysis , 2015, CARDIOTECHNIX 2015.

[12]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.

[13]  Kevin Vernooy,et al.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  Peter L. Sørensen,et al.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area is associated with long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2019, Heart rhythm.

[15]  Niraj Varma,et al.  Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Large variability in clinical judgement and definitions of left bundle branch block to identify candidates for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.