Fully automated QRS area measurement for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Radovan Smisek | Filip Plesinger | Antonius M W van Stipdonk | Josef Halamek | Pavel Jurak | Alexander H Maass | Mathias Meine | Kevin Vernooy | Frits W Prinzen | F. Plesinger | J. Halámek | P. Jurák | F. Prinzen | K. Vernooy | R. Smíšek | A. V. van Stipdonk | M. Meine | A. Maass
[1] E. Kaplan,et al. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .
[2] F. Prinzen,et al. Why QRS Duration Should Be Replaced by Better Measures of Electrical Activation to Improve Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.
[3] A. Sittig,et al. Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods. , 1990, European heart journal.
[4] T‐Wave Area Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.
[5] Pavel Jurák,et al. Robust multichannel QRS detection , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.
[6] S. Solomon,et al. Long-Term Survival of Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block Who Are Hypo-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.
[7] Mark A Hlatky,et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2013, Circulation.
[8] I. V. Van Gelder,et al. Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[9] I. V. Van Gelder,et al. QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.
[10] P. Tchou,et al. Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB. , 2014, Heart rhythm.
[11] Pavel Jurák,et al. Multichannel QRS Morphology Clustering - Data Preprocessing for Ultra-High-Frequency ECG Analysis , 2015, CARDIOTECHNIX 2015.
[12] Lluís Mont,et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.
[13] Kevin Vernooy,et al. Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.
[14] Peter L. Sørensen,et al. Vectorcardiographic QRS area is associated with long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2019, Heart rhythm.
[15] Niraj Varma,et al. Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] F. Prinzen,et al. Large variability in clinical judgement and definitions of left bundle branch block to identify candidates for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.