Evidence Based Selection of Housekeeping Genes

For accurate and reliable gene expression analysis, normalization of gene expression data against housekeeping genes (reference or internal control genes) is required. It is known that commonly used housekeeping genes (e.g. ACTB, GAPDH, HPRT1, and B2M) vary considerably under different experimental conditions and therefore their use for normalization is limited. We performed a meta-analysis of 13,629 human gene array samples in order to identify the most stable expressed genes. Here we show novel candidate housekeeping genes (e.g. RPS13, RPL27, RPS20 and OAZ1) with enhanced stability among a multitude of different cell types and varying experimental conditions. None of the commonly used housekeeping genes were present in the top 50 of the most stable expressed genes. In addition, using 2,543 diverse mouse gene array samples we were able to confirm the enhanced stability of the candidate novel housekeeping genes in another mammalian species. Therefore, the identified novel candidate housekeeping genes seem to be the most appropriate choice for normalizing gene expression data.

[1]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[2]  Stephen M. Hewitt,et al.  Post-analysis follow-up and validation of microarray experiments , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[3]  T. Hudson,et al.  Control genes and variability: absence of ubiquitous reference transcripts in diverse mammalian expression studies. , 2002, Genome research.

[4]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  T. Hudson,et al.  Characterization of variability in large-scale gene expression data: implications for study design. , 2002, Genomics.

[6]  F. Speleman,et al.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes , 2002, Genome Biology.

[7]  B. Decallonne,et al.  An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. , 2001, Methods.

[8]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Real-Time Quantitative PCR , 2002 .

[9]  M. Solanas,et al.  Unsuitability of using ribosomal RNA as loading control for Northern blot analyses related to the imbalance between messenger and ribosomal RNA content in rat mammary tumors. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  S. Bustin.  Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. , 2000, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[11]  P. J. Higgins,et al.  Control selection for RNA quantitation. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[12]  T. Grisar,et al.  Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[13]  Rainer M. Bohle,et al.  Real-time quantitative RT–PCR after laser-assisted cell picking , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[14]  D. Redmer,et al.  Quantification of lane-to-lane loading of poly(A) RNA using a biotinylated oligo(dT) probe and chemiluminescent detection. , 1995, BioTechniques.

[15]  Russell Higuchi,et al.  Kinetic PCR Analysis: Real-time Monitoring of DNA Amplification Reactions , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[16]  E. Spanakis,et al.  Problems related to the interpretation of autoradiographic data on gene expression using common constitutive transcripts as controls. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.