The Development of an Ordinary Least Squares Parametric Model to Estimate the Cost Per Flying Hour of ‘Unknown’ Aircraft Types and a Comparative Application †

The development of a parametric model for the variable portion of the Cost Per Flying Hour (CPFH) of an ‘unknown’ aircraft platform and its application to diverse types of fixed and rotary wing aircraft development programs (F-35A, Su-57, Dassault Rafale, T-X candidates, AW189, Airbus RACER among others) is presented. The novelty of this paper lies in the utilization of a diverse sample of aircraft types, aiming to obtain a ‘universal’ Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) applicable to a wide range of platforms. Moreover, the model does not produce absolute cost figures but rather analogy ratios versus the F-16’s CPFH, broadening the model’s applicability. The model will enable an analyst to carry out timely and reliable Operational and Support (O&S) cost estimates for a wide range of ‘unknown’ aircraft platforms at their early stages of conceptual design, despite the lack of actual data from the utilization and support life cycle stages. The statistical analysis is based on Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, conducted with R software (v5.3.1, released on 2 July 2018). The model’s output is validated against officially published CPFH data of several existing ‘mature’ aircraft platforms, including one of the most prolific fighter jet types all over the world, the F-16C/D, which is also used as a reference to compare CPFH estimates of various next generation aircraft platforms. Actual CPFH data of the Hellenic Air Force (HAF) have been used to develop the parametric model, the application of which is expected to significantly inform high level decision making regarding aircraft procurement, budgeting and future force structure planning, including decisions related to large scale aircraft modifications and upgrades.

[1]  Matthew E. Laubacher Analysis and Forecasting of Air Force Operating and Support Cost for Rotary Aircraft , 2012 .

[2]  Michael T Bryant,et al.  Forecasting the KC-135 Cost per Flying Hour: A Panel Data Analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Michael J. Hicks,et al.  The impact of economic factors and acquisition reforms on the cost of defense weapon systems , 2008 .

[4]  Edward D. White,et al.  Predicting the Cost Per Flying Hour for the F-16 Using Programmatic and Operational Data , 2007 .

[5]  Ross Theodore McNutt Reducing DoD Product Development Time: The Role of the Schedule Development Process. , 1998 .

[6]  David S. Christensen,et al.  The Impact of the Packard Commission's Recommendations on Reducing Cost Overruns on Defense Acquisition Contracts , 1999 .

[7]  John C. Hawkins Analysis and Forecasting of Army Operating and Support Cost for Rotary Aircraft , 2004 .

[8]  Edward D. White,et al.  Empirical Evidence Relating Aircraft Age and Operating and Support Cost Growth , 2008 .

[9]  Ilias Lappas,et al.  Use of Cost-Adjusted Importance Measures for Aircraft System Maintenance Optimization , 2018 .

[10]  Edward G. Keating,et al.  Metrics to Compare Aircraft Operating and Support Costs in the Department of Defense , 2015 .

[11]  Patrick D. Armstrong Developing an Aggregate Marginal Cost Per Flying Hour Model for the U.S. Air Force's F-15 Fighter Aircraft , 2012 .

[12]  Giles K. Smith,et al.  The Cost and Performance Implications of Reliability Improvements in the F-16A/B Aircraft , 1988 .

[13]  Tyler J Hess Cost Forecasting Models for the Air Force Flying Hour Program , 2012 .

[14]  Craig C. Sherbrooke Using Sorties vs. Flying Hours to Predict Aircraft Spares Demand , 1997 .

[15]  Scott Houser,et al.  A Physics-Based Alternative to Cost-Per-Flying-Hour Models of Aircraft Consumption Costs , 2000 .

[16]  John Birkler,et al.  Assessing Competitive Strategies for the Joint Strike Fighter: Opportunities and Options , 2001 .

[17]  Gregory G. Hildebrandt,et al.  An Estimation of USAF Aircraft Operating and Support Cost Relations , 1990 .