How to build a yeast nucleus

Biological functions including gene expression and DNA repair are affected by the 3D architecture of the genome, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. Notably, it remains unclear to what extent nuclear architecture is driven by generic physical properties of polymers or by specific factors such as proteins binding particular DNA sequences. The budding yeast nucleus has been intensely studied by imaging and biochemical techniques, resulting in a large quantitative data set on locus positions and DNA contact frequencies. We recently described a quantitative model of the interphase yeast nucleus in which chromosomes are represented as passively moving polymer chains. This model ignores the DNA sequence information except for specific constraints at the centromeres, telomeres, and the ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Despite its simplicity, the model accounts for a large majority of experimental data, including absolute and relative locus positions and contact frequency patterns at chromosomal and subchromosomal scales. Here, we also illustrate the model's ability to reproduce observed features of chromatin movements. Our results strongly suggest that the dynamic large-scale architecture of the yeast nucleus is dominated by statistical properties of randomly moving polymers with a few sequence-specific constraints, rather than by a large number of DNA-specific factors or epigenetic modifications. In addition, we show that our model accounts for recently measured variations in homologous recombination efficiency, illustrating its potential for quantitatively understanding functional consequences of nuclear architecture.

[1]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  Systematic characterization of the conformation and dynamics of budding yeast chromosome XII , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  C. Zimmer,et al.  Effect of nuclear architecture on the efficiency of double-strand break repair , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  B. Jones,et al.  Global identification of yeast chromosome interactions using Genome conformation capture. , 2009, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[4]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. , 2007, Seminars in cancer biology.

[5]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  Computational models of large-scale genome architecture. , 2014, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[6]  G. Getz,et al.  High-order chromatin architecture shapes the landscape of chromosomal alterations in cancer , 2012 .

[7]  Nils B Becker,et al.  Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[8]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[9]  S. Gasser,et al.  The budding yeast nucleus. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[10]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  Principles of chromosomal organization: lessons from yeast , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  Chromosome arm length and nuclear constraints determine the dynamic relationship of yeast subtelomeres , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Brickner,et al.  Gene positioning and expression. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  F. Hediger,et al.  Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  A Predictive Computational Model of the Dynamic 3D Interphase Yeast Nucleus , 2012, Current Biology.

[16]  M. Kupiec,et al.  Finding a match: how do homologous sequences get together for recombination? , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  M. Nomura,et al.  Visual Analysis of the Yeast 5S rRNA Gene Transcriptome: Regulation and Role of La Protein , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  Ralf Everaers,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Interphase Chromosomes , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  A. Taddei,et al.  Active genes at the nuclear pore complex. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[20]  O. Gadal,et al.  Genome organization and function: a view from yeast and Arabidopsis. , 2010, Molecular plant.

[21]  Gerd Gruenert,et al.  Chromosome positioning and the clustering of functionally related loci in yeast is driven by chromosomal interactions , 2012, Nucleus.

[22]  A. Murray,et al.  Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.

[23]  Job Dekker,et al.  Mapping in Vivo Chromatin Interactions in Yeast Suggests an Extended Chromatin Fiber with Regional Variation in Compaction* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Monika Tsai-Pflugfelder,et al.  Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. , 2012, Genes & development.

[25]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Dynamical modeling of three-dimensional genome organization in interphase budding yeast. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Rodney Rothstein,et al.  Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  D. Moazed,et al.  The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[29]  G. Fredrickson The theory of polymer dynamics , 1996 .

[30]  Yoshinori Nishino,et al.  Chromosomes without a 30-nm chromatin fiber , 2012, Nucleus.

[31]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development , 2005, Development.

[32]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing , 1998, Nature.

[33]  F. Alber,et al.  Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast , 2012, Genome research.

[34]  I. Léger-Silvestre,et al.  Functional compartmentalization of the nucleus in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Chromosoma.

[35]  Susan M. Gasser,et al.  Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of the Yeast Genome , 2010, Nature.

[37]  S. Gasser,et al.  Chromosome Dynamics in the Yeast Interphase Nucleus , 2001, Science.

[38]  J. Fuchs,et al.  Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[39]  B. Dujon,et al.  Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  Susan M. Gasser,et al.  Live Imaging of Telomeres yKu and Sir Proteins Define Redundant Telomere-Anchoring Pathways in Yeast , 2002, Current Biology.

[41]  Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin,et al.  SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope , 2006, Nature.

[42]  Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin,et al.  High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast , 2008, Nature Methods.