Environmental impacts in global value chains : using hot spot analysis to identify priorities for improving the sustainability of German coffee production and consumption

The current patterns of consuming and producing German coffee cause environmental impacts. Identifying the most relevant environmental impacts (hot spots) along the global value chain of German coffee is the first step to improve its environmental performance. Hot spots need immediate attention from companies, practitioners, and scientists in order to create sustainable solutions. The purpose of this study was to identify the hot spots of German coffee by conducting an environmental Hot Spot Analysis (eHSA), and to discuss the contribution of the eHSA method from a sustainability science perspective. The eHSA involved a literature review, six interviews with experts from the German coffee industry, and a calculation of hot spots based on expert rankings of seven environmental impact categories within each of the four phases of the coffee value chain. The focus was on environmental impacts along the value chain of German coffee. A survey with German coffee consumers was conducted to see which impacts of coffee they perceive as hot spots. German coffee has six hot spots along its value chain, of which five are located in producing countries, and one is caused in Germany. The five hot spots of the agriculture phase are the environmental categories energy resources, water resources, land use and biodiversity, emissions to air, and emissions to water. The category emissions to air had the highest agreement among the experts to be a hot spot. The hot spot of the use phase is the category energy resources. Consumers agreed with the expert assessment of hot spots for the categories energy resources, water resources, land use and biodiversity, emissions to air and emissions to water in the agriculture phase. However, they assessed also the category raw materials in the agriculture phase as a hot spot, but not their own use of energy resources in the use phase. Five out of six hot spots are caused in producing countries in the global South. Most of the impacts are related to the use of agrochemicals and untreated wastewater. Companies and consumers in Germany need to take environmental responsibility for their actions to address and reduce the increasingly globalized impacts of consumption in industrialized countries. To tackle the hot spots, coffee roasters and retailers need to collaborate with farmers, unions, associations, non-governmental organizations, consumers, and scientists. Transdisciplinary or action research projects could support the creation of legitimate sustainable solutions to make coffee consumption in Germany less environmentally harmful and more socially and economically beneficial.

[1]  A. Cox Supply Chains, Markets and Power: Managing Buyer and Supplier Power Regimes , 2001 .

[2]  H. N. Chanakya,et al.  Environmental Issues and Management in Primary Coffee Processing , 2004 .

[3]  Jurgis Kazimieras Staniškis,et al.  Sustainable consumption and production: how to make it possible , 2011, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[4]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification , 2005 .

[5]  Interdependence between consumption in the North and sustainable communities in the South , 2005 .

[6]  W. Pelupessy,et al.  Upgrading of Lowland coffee in Central America , 2008 .

[7]  Michelle Adams,et al.  An integral framework for sustainability assessment in agro-industries: application to the Costa Rican coffee industry , 2006 .

[8]  Robin Wensley,et al.  In search of ‘interfirm management’ in supply chains: recognizing contradictions of language and power by listening , 2002 .

[9]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice , 2007 .

[10]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso). , 2009 .

[11]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[12]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[13]  M. W. Hansen,et al.  Environmental upgrading of Third World enterprises through linkages to transnational corporations. Theoretical perspectives and preliminary evidence , 2004 .

[14]  Solange I. Mussatto,et al.  Production, Composition, and Application of Coffee and Its Industrial Residues , 2011 .

[15]  Russell Greenberg,et al.  Biodiversity Loss in Latin American Coffee Landscapes: Review of the Evidence on Ants, Birds, and Trees , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  M. Munasinghe,et al.  Can Sustainable Consumers and Producers Save the Planet? , 2010 .

[17]  Doug Lockwood,et al.  Product carbon footprinting: Improving environmental performance and manufacturing efficiency , 2009 .

[18]  Anne Jerneck,et al.  Structuring sustainability science , 2011 .

[19]  Paul F. Donald,et al.  Biodiversity Impacts of Some Agricultural Commodity Production Systems , 2004 .

[20]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  David A. Welch Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners , 2007 .

[22]  Michele Micheletti,et al.  Shopping for Human Rights. An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Sustainability hot spot analysis : a streamlined life cycle assessment towards sustainable food chains , 2010 .

[24]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[25]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Supply Chain Information in Environmental Management Accounting – the case of a Vietnamese Coffee Exporter , 2007 .

[26]  José Miguel Laínez,et al.  Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chains modeling: An LCA approach , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  Kelly F Austin Coffee exports as ecological, social, and physical unequal exchange: A cross-national investigation of the java trade , 2012 .

[28]  C. Marshall World Coffee Trade , 1985 .

[29]  Stefano Micelli,et al.  Environmental Strategies, Upgrading and Competitive Advantage in Global Value Chains , 2013 .

[30]  Samir K. Srivastava,et al.  Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review , 2007 .

[31]  U. Sonesson,et al.  7 – Environmental issues in the production of beverages: the global coffee chain , 2003 .

[32]  Assey Mbang Janvier-James,et al.  A New Introduction to Supply Chains and Supply Chain Management: Definitions and Theories Perspective , 2011 .

[33]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Resource intensity in global food chains : the hot spot analysis , 2010 .

[34]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  Supply Chain Redesign: Transforming Supply Chains into Integrated Value Systems , 2002 .

[35]  Kirsten L.L. Oleson,et al.  Thinking about knowing: conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary environmental research , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[36]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[38]  M. Kinnaird,et al.  Caffeine and Conservation , 2003, Science.

[39]  Terri Gullickson Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[40]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Sustainability Science Needs to Include Sustainable Consumption , 2012 .

[41]  U. Witt The Dynamics of Consumer Behavior and the Transition to Sustainable Consumption Patterns , 2011 .

[42]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management , 2008 .

[43]  A. Tukker Sustainable Consumption by Certification: The Case of Coffee , 2009 .

[44]  Jennifer Bair,et al.  Governing global value chains: an introduction , 2008 .

[45]  Allen Blackman,et al.  Shade Coffee & Tree Cover Loss: Lessons from El Salvador , 2007 .

[46]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25 , 2006 .

[47]  S. Lorek,et al.  Production-consumption systems and the pursuit of sustainability , 2009 .

[48]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Comparing the ecological footprint with the biodiversity footprint of products , 2012 .

[49]  A. Damodaran Conflict of Trade-Facilitating Environmental Regulations with Biodiversity Concerns: The Case of Coffee-Farming Units in India , 2002 .

[50]  R. Klassen,et al.  Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance , 2012 .

[51]  Anna Lúcia Mourad,et al.  Environmental Profile of Brazilian Green Coffee (6 pp) , 2006 .

[52]  P. Schieberle,et al.  Coffee, Tea, Cocoa , 2004 .

[53]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Environmental and social responsibility in supply chains: The practise of choice and inter-organisational management , 2012 .

[54]  Philipp Mayring Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[55]  R. Klassen,et al.  Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain , 2008 .

[56]  Dietlinde Quack,et al.  Environmental impacts of different methods of coffee preparation , 2011 .

[57]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations , 2012, Nature.

[58]  H. Kloos,et al.  The impact of traditional coffee processing on river water quality in Ethiopia and the urgency of adopting sound environmental practices , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.