Seismic improvement of slender masonry tower by using hysteretic devices and partial prestressing technique

An innovative system for seismic improvement of slender masonry towers by using hysteretic devices and partial prestressing technique was developed and applied to a case study. The proposed technique consists in a low level of prestressing of the upper part of the tower in order to localize in the un-prestressed lower part of the tower, i.e. a limited zone near the basement, the vertical displacements due to the cracking of masonry under seismic action. The positioning of dissipative devices, such as the Buckling-Restrained Axial Dampers, across the localization zone allows a significant contribution in terms of damping for hysteretic dissipation. The main effect of such an intervention is the reduction of the seismic demand to the tower and consequently the reduction of the top displacement as well as of the level of damage of the masonry. Both numerical analyses and experimental tests on a scale model of a Venetian bell tower were carried out showing the efficiency and reliability of the proposed technique.

[1]  Roberto Scotta,et al.  Global damage indexes for the seismic performance assessement of RC structures , 2009 .

[2]  24 .-Some Experimental Results on the Strength of Brick Masonry Walls , 2022 .

[3]  J O Jirsa,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF CONCRETE UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOADING , 1969 .

[4]  Federico Perotti,et al.  Seismic analysis of the Asinelli Tower and earthquakes in Bologna , 1998 .

[5]  Mohsen A. Issa,et al.  Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames , 2002 .

[6]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  FIBRE BEAM–COLUMN MODEL FOR NON‐LINEAR ANALYSIS OF R/C FRAMES: PART I. FORMULATION , 1996 .

[7]  Salvador Ivorra,et al.  State of the art of industrial masonry chimneys: A review from construction to strengthening , 2011 .

[8]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[9]  F. Filippou,et al.  Geometrically Nonlinear Flexibility-Based Frame Finite Element , 1998 .

[10]  S. Casolo,et al.  Dynamics of slender masonry towers considering hysteretic behaviour and damage , 2007 .

[11]  Elizabeth Vintzileou,et al.  Three-Leaf Stone Masonry Strengthened by Injecting Cement Grouts , 1995 .

[12]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[13]  Richard N. White,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques , 1999 .

[14]  C. Uang,et al.  Evaluation of seismic energy in structures , 1990 .

[15]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Theory and application of experimental model analysis in earthquake engineering , 1981 .

[16]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower , 2010 .

[17]  M. L. Beconcini.  Costruzioni in zona sismica : con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni DM 14.01.2008 , 2013 .

[18]  Georgios E. Stavroulakis,et al.  Strengthening of masonry using metal reinforcement: A parametric numerical investigation , 2009 .

[19]  T. T. Soong.  Review of Principles of Passive Supplemental Damping and Seismic Isolation by C. Christopoulos and A. Filiatrault , 2007 .

[20]  Siro Casolo,et al.  A THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL FOR VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF SLENDER MEDIEVAL MASONRY TOWERS , 1998 .