Put that Away and Talk to Me - the Effects of Smartphone induced Ostracism while Interacting with an Intelligent Virtual Agent

This paper presents the implementation of a prototype including a virtual environment in which humans are exposed to a seemingly autonomous Intelligent Virtual Agent (IVA) that ostracises them by using its smartphone during a conversation (a phenomenon called phubbing with adverse outcomes in interhuman communication). Based on the temporal need threat model of ostracism, the effects of phubbing were examined in an online experiment with three conditions (no vs. proactive vs. reactive phubbing) using an IVA. The results showed a significant effect on the warmth attributed to the IVA. Consequently, our study provides partial support that the negative effects of phubbing can be transfered to human-agent interaction. It is thereby not only in line with the underlying theory, but also provides a prototype suitable for future research with phubbing in the context of IVAs.

[1]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Thwarting the Need to Belong: Understanding the Interpersonal and Inner Effects of Social Exclusion , 2007 .

[2]  Gengfeng Niu,et al.  Parental phubbing and adolescent problematic mobile phone use: The role of parent-child relationship and self-control , 2020 .

[3]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[4]  Meredith E. David,et al.  My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Antonio Egidio Nardi,et al.  Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  M. Gribaudo,et al.  2002 , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[7]  Ling Gao,et al.  Parental Phubbing and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Moderated Mediation Model of Moral Disengagement and Online Disinhibition , 2020, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[8]  Sarah M. Coyne,et al.  Parent and Child Technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-Old adolescents , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Tania R. Nuñez,et al.  A third-person perspective on phubbing: Observing smartphone-induced social exclusion generates negative affect, stress, and derogatory attitudes , 2020 .

[10]  Patrick Gebhard,et al.  Can Social Agents elicit Shame as Humans do? , 2019, 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[11]  Chia-chen Yang,et al.  On the Phone When We’re Hanging Out: Digital Social Multitasking (DSMT) and Its Socioemotional Implications , 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[12]  Andrew H Hales,et al.  Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs , 2018, The Journal of social psychology.

[13]  Pengcheng Wang,et al.  Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length , 2017 .

[14]  Rick Richardson,et al.  How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious , 2006 .

[15]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  M. Leary,et al.  Coping with Rejection: Derogating Those Who Choose Us Last , 2001 .

[18]  Patrick Gebhard,et al.  Would you Follow my Instructions if I was not Human? Examining Obedience towards Virtual Agents , 2019, 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[19]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Meredith E. David,et al.  Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media , 2017, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[21]  Xiaochun Xie,et al.  Mother Phubbing and Adolescent Cyberbullying: The Mediating Role of Perceived Mother Acceptance and the Moderating Role of Emotional Stability , 2020, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[22]  H. Hlavacs,et al.  Does social exclusion hurt virtually like it hurts in real-life ? The role of agency and social presence in the perception and experience of social exclusion , 2014 .

[23]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  佐藤誠三郞,et al.  1997 , 1978, The Winning Cars of the Indianapolis 500.

[26]  Ling Gao,et al.  Parental Phubbing and Adolescents’ Depressive Symptoms: Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support as Moderators , 2019, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[27]  Michelle Drouin,et al.  Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Meredith E. David,et al.  Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Brandon T. McDaniel,et al.  Technoference: Parent Distraction With Technology and Associations With Child Behavior Problems. , 2018, Child development.

[30]  Halis Sakız,et al.  Effects of Phubbing: Relationships With Psychodemographic Variables , 2019, Psychological reports.

[31]  Benjamin Eckstein,et al.  Adapted Foreigner-directed Communication towards Virtual Agents , 2018, IVA.

[32]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Chapter 6 Ostracism: A Temporal Need‐Threat Model , 2009 .

[33]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[34]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Trusting Digital Chameleons: The Effect of Mimicry by a Virtual Social Agent on User Trust , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[35]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality , 2013 .

[36]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Yijie Wu,et al.  Public Cellphone Use Does Not Activate Negative Responses in Others...Unless They Hate Cellphones , 2016, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Meredith E. David,et al.  Boss phubbing, trust, job satisfaction and employee performance , 2020 .

[39]  Brandon T. McDaniel,et al.  “You phubbed me for that?” Reason given for phubbing and perceptions of interactional quality and exclusion , 2021, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[40]  S. Bulut,et al.  Phubbing and What Could Be Its Determinants: A Dugout of Literature , 2019, Psychology.

[41]  Frank M. Schneider,et al.  Permanently online - Permanently connected: Explorations into university students' use of social media and mobile smart devices , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  The effects of "phubbing" on social interaction , 2018 .

[43]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  When rejection stings: how self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.