GT-MSOCC: A Domain for Research on Human - Computer Interaction and Decision Aiding in Supervisory Control Systems

Modeling and aiding operators in supervisory control environments are necessary prerequisites to the effective use of automation in complex dynamic systems. A research program is described that explores these issues within the context of the Georgia Tech-Multisatellite Operations Control Center (GT-MSOCC). GT-MSOCC is a real-time interactive simulation of the operator interface to a NASA ground control system for unmanned Earth-orbiting satellites. GT-MSOCC is a high fidelity domain in which a range of modeling, decision aiding, and workstation design issues addressing human-computer interaction may be explored. GT-MSOCC is described in detail. The use of high-fidelity domains as research tools is also discussed, and the validity and generalizability of such results to other domains are examined. In addition to a description of GT-MSOCC, several other related parts are included. A GT-MSOCC operator function model (OFM) is presented. The GT-MSOCC model illustrates an enhancement to the general operator function modeling methodology that extends the model's utility for design applications. The proposed methodology represents operator actions as the lowest level discrete control network nodes. Actions may be cognitive or manual; operator action nodes are linked to information needs or system reconfiguration commands. Thus augmented, the operator function model provides a formal representation of operator interaction with the controlled system and serves as the foundation for subsequent theoretical and empirical research. A brief overview of experimental and methodological studies using GT-MSOCC is also given.

[1]  Christine M. Mitchell,et al.  Use of Model-Based Qualitative Icons and Adaptive Windows in Workstations for Supervisory Control Systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Morten Lind,et al.  The use of Flow Models for Automated Plant Diagnosis , 1981 .

[3]  Kenneth R. Hammond Generalization in Operational Contexts: What Does It Mean? Can It be Done? , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Jon D. Erickson,et al.  Future uses of machine intelligence and robotics for the space station and implications for the U.S. economy , 1985, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  L. P. Goodstein,et al.  Discriminative Display Support for Process Operators , 1981 .

[8]  Christine M. Mitchell,et al.  Design Strategies for Computer-Based Information Displays in Real-Time Control Systems , 1983 .

[9]  C. M. Mitchell,et al.  Multi-Modal Interfaces in Supervisory Control , 1986 .

[10]  Christine M. Mitchell,et al.  A Discrete Control Model of Operator Function: A Methodology for Information Display Design , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  David D. Woods,et al.  Visual Momentum: A Concept to Improve the Cognitive Coupling of Person and Computer , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Christine M. Mitchell,et al.  Multimodal User Input to Supervisory Control Systems: Voice-Augmented Keyboard , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Why Alphabetic Keyboards Are Not Easy to Use: Keyboard Layout Doesn't Much Matter , 1982 .

[14]  T. Govindaraj Qualitative simulation of complex dynamic systems: An application to a marine powerplant under supervisory control , 1983 .

[15]  William B. Rouse,et al.  PLANT: An experimental task for the study of human problem solving in process control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Richard J. Jagacinski,et al.  A Finite-State Description of Coordination in a Two-Handed Target Acquisition Task , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Morten Lind,et al.  Coping with complexity , 2006, Nature.