Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change

Spatial planners around the world need to make climate change adaptation plans. Climate adaptation planning requires combining spatial information with stakeholder values. This study demonstrates the potential of geodesign tools as a mean to integrate spatial analysis with stakeholder participation in adaptation planning. The tools are interactive and provide dynamic feedback on stakeholder objectives in response to the application of spatial measures. Different rationalities formed by underlying internalized values influence the reasoning of decision-making. Four tools were developed, each tailored to different rationalities varying between a collective or individual viewpoint and analytical or political arguments. The tools were evaluated in an experiment with four groups of participants that were set around an interactive mapping device: the touch table. To study how local decision-making on adaptation can be supported, this study focuses on a specific case study in the Netherlands. In this case study, multiple different stakeholders need to make spatial decisions on land use and water management planning in response to climate change. The collaborative use of four geodesign tools was evaluated in an interactive experiment. The results show that the geodesign tools were able to integrate the engagement of stakeholders and assessment of measures. The experiment showed that decision-making on adaptation to climate change can benefit from the use of geodesign tools as long as the tool is carefully matched to the rationality that applies to the adaptation issue. Although the tools were tested to support the design of adaptation plans in a Dutch setting, the tools could be used for regional adaptation planning in other countries such as the development of regional adaptation strategies (RAS) as required by the European Union or on a national scale to support developing national adaptation plans of action (NAPAs) as initiated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for least developed countries.

[1]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[2]  C. Giupponi,et al.  Participatory assessment of adaptation strategies to flood risk in the Upper Brahmaputra and Danube river basins , 2011 .

[3]  Eduardo Dias,et al.  Beauty and Brains: Integrating Easy Spatial Design and Advanced Urban Sustainability Models , 2013 .

[4]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Reconsidering the Effectiveness of Scientific Tools for Negotiating Local Solutions to Conflicts between Recreation and Conservation with Stakeholders , 2011 .

[5]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  The role of small scale sand dams in securing water supply under climate change in Ethiopia , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[6]  R. Margerum.  Collaborative Planning , 2002 .

[7]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  E. Wilson.  Adapting to Climate Change at the Local Level: The Spatial Planning Response , 2006 .

[9]  Simon Swaffield,et al.  Science for action at the local landscape scale , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  L. J. Carton,et al.  Map making and map use in a multi-actor context: Spatial visualizations and frame conflicts in regional policymaking in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[11]  Adele Celino,et al.  Explorative Nature of Negotiation in Participatory Decision Making for Sustainability , 2011 .

[12]  John A. Hall,et al.  Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks , 2013 .

[13]  Benjamin L. Preston,et al.  Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations , 2011 .

[14]  Raoul Beunen,et al.  When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? , 2011 .

[15]  T. Luthe,et al.  Building resilience to climate change – the role of cooperation in alpine tourism networks , 2015 .

[16]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Using MapTable® to Learn About Sustainable Urban Development , 2013 .

[17]  Gustavo Arciniegas,et al.  Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as a Tool in Reducing a Community’s Ecological Footprint , 2013 .

[18]  Nigel W.T. Quinn,et al.  Bridging the Gaps between Design and Use: Developing Tools to Support Environmental Management and Policy , 2008 .

[19]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Performance of Planning Support Systems: What is it, and how do we report on it? , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[20]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Comparison of Geodesign Tools to Communicate Stakeholder Values , 2015 .

[21]  K. Emanuel,et al.  Evaluating Flood Resilience Strategies for Coastal Megacities , 2014, Science.

[22]  Euro Beinat,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Location-Awareness in the Acceptance of Mobile Systems , 2008 .

[23]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  A dynamic assessment tool for exploring and communicating vulnerability to floods and climate change , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. , 2007 .

[25]  Susanne C Moser,et al.  A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Tejo Spit,et al.  Towards adaptive spatial planning for climate change: Balancing between robustness and flexibility , 2013 .

[27]  A. K. Tank,et al.  New climate change scenarios for the Netherlands. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  Chi Xiao-y,et al.  Fundamentals of GeoDesign , 2010 .

[29]  Fred Toppen,et al.  Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development , 2013 .

[30]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Assessment of the effectiveness of participatory developed adaptation strategies for HCMC , 2014 .

[31]  S. Dessai,et al.  Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science , 2013 .

[32]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  D. Havlik,et al.  Sustainable Urban Development Planner for Climate Change Adaptation ( SUDPLAN ) , 2010 .

[34]  T Eikelboom,et al.  Interactive spatial tools for the design of regional adaptation strategies. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Ralf Wieland,et al.  LandCaRe DSS--an interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Chapter three Bridging the gaps between design and use: Developing tools to support environmental management and policy , 2009 .

[37]  James D. Ford,et al.  A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations , 2011 .

[38]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production , 2010 .

[39]  Gustavo A. Arciniegas,et al.  Interactive Marine Spatial Planning: Siting Tidal Energy Arrays around the Mull of Kintyre , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Integrating Decision-Making Support in Geocollaboration Tools , 2014 .

[41]  P. Sands.  The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1992 .

[42]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Soil Subsidence in Peat Meadow Areas in Friesland in Relation to Land and Water Management, Climate Change, and Adaptation , 2015, Environmental Management.

[43]  Martin Tomko,et al.  The Online What if? Planning Support System , 2013 .

[44]  M. Hemmati.  Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict , 2002 .