Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI

Examination of functional interactions through effective connectivity requires the determination of three distinct levels of information: (1) the regions involved in the process and forming the spatial support of the network, (2) the presence or absence of interactions between each pair of regions, and (3) the directionality of the existing interactions. While many methods exist to select regions (Step 1), very little is available to complete Step 2. The two main methods developed so far, structural equation modeling (SEM) and dynamical causal modeling (DCM), usually require precise prior information to be used, while such information is sometimes lacking. Assuming that Step 1 was successfully completed, we here propose a data-driven method to deal with Step 2 and extract functional interactions from fMRI datasets through partial correlations. Partial correlation is more closely related to effective connectivity than marginal correlation and provides a convenient graphical representation for functional interactions. As an instance of brain interactivity investigation, we consider how simple hand movements are processed by the bihemispheric cortical motor network. In the proposed framework, Bayesian analysis makes it possible to estimate and test the partial statistical dependencies between regions without any prior model on the underlying functional interactions. We demonstrate the interest of this approach on real data.

[1]  M. Gazzaniga The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[2]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[3]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[4]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[6]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Role of the healthy hemisphere in recovery after resection of the supplementary motor area , 2004, Neurology.

[7]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Radford M. Neal On Deducing Conditional Independence from d-Separation in Causal Graphs with Feedback (Research Note) , 2000, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[9]  B. Biswal,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting‐state functional connectivity maps , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  H Duffau,et al.  Intraoperative direct subcortical stimulation for identification of the internal capsule, combined with an image-guided stereotactic system during surgery for basal ganglia lesions. , 2000, Surgical neurology.

[12]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[13]  H. Duffau,et al.  Récupération fonctionnelle à la suite de lésions de l'aire somato-sensorielle primaire : Etude des mécanismes de compensation , 2001 .

[14]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[15]  James V. Stone,et al.  Making connections about brain connectivity , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  S. Schultz Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[17]  H Duffau,et al.  [Functional recuperation after resection of gliomas infiltrating primary somatosensory fields. Study of perioperative electric stimulation]. , 2001, Neuro-Chirurgie.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Martinerie,et al.  Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  H. Künzle An autoradiographic analysis of the efferent connections from premotor and adjacent prefrontal regions (areas 6 and 9) in macaca fascicularis. , 1978, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[21]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  K OrJ Numerical Bayesian methods applied to signal processing , 1996 .

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  S. Swinnen Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[30]  C. Calautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review , 2003, Stroke.

[31]  R. Ivry,et al.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activity during unimanual hand movements relates to task complexity. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Peter Spirtes,et al.  Directed Cyclic Graphical Representations of Feedback Models , 1995, UAI.

[33]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  J. Daunizeau,et al.  Conditional correlation as a measure of mediated interactivity in fMRI and MEG/EEG , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[35]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[36]  Tao Xiong,et al.  A combined SVM and LDA approach for classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[37]  M. Filippi,et al.  Cortical adaptation in patients with MS: a cross-sectional functional MRI study of disease phenotypes , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[38]  W. Chen,et al.  Principles of BOLD Functional MRI , 2000 .

[39]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Analysis of neural network interactions related to associative learning using structural equation modeling , 1995 .

[40]  M. Lowe,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Single and Multislice Echoplanar Imaging Using Resting-State Fluctuations , 1998, NeuroImage.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[43]  G. Jackson,et al.  Changes in effective connectivity models in the presence of task‐correlated motion: An fMRI study , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[44]  John D Carew,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in supplementary motor area connectivity during unilateral finger movements , 2004, NeuroImage.

[45]  M E Meyerand,et al.  Combining independent component analysis and correlation analysis to probe interregional connectivity in fMRI task activation datasets. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[46]  K. Riedel Numerical Bayesian Methods Applied to Signal Processing , 1996 .

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[48]  CinziaCalautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults , 2003 .

[49]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Identifying Independencies in Causal Graphs with Feedback , 1996, UAI.

[50]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[51]  G. Marrelec,et al.  Heading for data-driven measures of effective connectivity in functional MRI , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[52]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .

[53]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  L. Parsons,et al.  Interregional connectivity to primary motor cortex revealed using MRI resting state images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[56]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[57]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[58]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[59]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[60]  D. McCandless Fundamental neuroscience , 1997, Metabolic Brain Disease.

[61]  N. Ward,et al.  Plasticity and the functional reorganization of the human brain. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[62]  G. Leichnetz Afferent and efferent connections of the dorsolateral precentral gyrus (area 4, hand/arm region) in the macaque monkey, with comparisons to area 8 , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[63]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective Connectivity and Intersubject Variability: Using a Multisubject Network to Test Differences and Commonalities , 2002, NeuroImage.

[64]  T A Yousry,et al.  The motor cortex: anatomic substrates of function. , 2001, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.