New Results on Classifying EMG Signals for Interfacing Patients and Mechanical Devices

In modern days the goal of rehabilitative robotics is to take advantage of robotics-inspired solutions in order to assist people affected by disabilities using physical training assisted by robots. In this way the rehabilitative exercises could be autonomously performed by the patients, with a reduced involvement of the therapist, making high-intensity rehabilitative therapy an affordable reality. Moreover high-precision sensors integrated in rehabilitation devices would allow a quantitative evaluation of the progresses obtained, effectively comparing different training strategies. That would represent a huge scientific achievement in a field where evaluations up to this day are performed only by means of subjective observations. Important results were obtained in rehabilitative robotics, but results in the field of the hand rehabilitation are poorer, due to the high complexity and dexterity of the organ. This chapter proposes to integrate the detection of the muscular activity in the rehabilitation loop. A new EMG analysis tool was developed to achieve a reliable early recognition of the movement. Experimental results confirmed that our system is able to recognize the performed movement and generate the first control variable after 200 ms, below the commonly accepted delay of 300 ms for interactive applications. This shows that it is possible to effectively use an EMG classifier to obtain a reliable controller for a flexible device, able to assist the patient only after having detected his effort.

[1]  K. Y. Tong,et al.  An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: Task training system for stroke rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  Marek Perkowski,et al.  Adaptive Reflex Control for an Artificial Hand , 2003 .

[3]  G. Gini,et al.  Classification of EMG signals through wavelet analysis and neural networks for controlling an active hand prosthesis , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Adaptive regulation of assistance ‘as needed’ in robot-assisted motor skill learning and neuro-rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  Giuseppina Gini,et al.  Robotic hands: design review and proposal of new design process , 2007 .

[8]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  ERACLE: Electromyography System for Gesture Interaction , 2011, HCI.

[9]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Michele Folgheraiter,et al.  Human-like reflex control for an artificial hand. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[11]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  J. Laidlaw,et al.  ANATOMY OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1967, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[13]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  G. Gini,et al.  An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[15]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Giuseppina Gini,et al.  From the Classification of EMG Signals to the Development of a New Lower Arm Prosthesis , 2011 .

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part II: Experimental Demonstration of Optimal Myoprocessor Performance , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979 .

[19]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Classifying human manipulation behavior , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[20]  Brian A. Telfer,et al.  Wavelet transforms and neural networks for compression and recognition , 1996, Neural Networks.

[21]  N. Hogan,et al.  Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  G.R. Naik,et al.  ICA based identification of sources in sEMG , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information.

[23]  F. Mohd-Yasin,et al.  Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications , 2006, Biological Procedures Online.

[24]  Michele Folgheraiter,et al.  Acquisition and analysis of EMG signals to recognize multiple hand movements for prosthetic applications , 2012, HRI 2012.