Open data ecosystems: an international comparison

Purpose In this paper, the authors compare the open government data (OGD) ecosystems of Mexico, Russia and the USA in an effort to extract some of the major points of similarity and differentiation between these countries and to trace how variations in these ecosystems may be related to context-specific historical problems and politics, particularly with regard to the possibility of sustained and institutionalized practice. Design/methodology/approach The authors take a comparative approach, using a set of concepts commonly applied to the three countries to analyze similarities and differences within this group. The authors gathered textual data and information, the searches for relevant documents guided by a set of concepts or criteria that are frequently used in studies of government’s open data readiness assessment. Findings The authors conclude by focusing on the very different national exigencies that have given rise to open data ecosystems in the three countries, the variations in policy vehicles and implementation schemes that have instantiated open data practices within the three ecosystems and the common challenges that each country faces in institutionalizing OGD programs beyond the tenures of their current executives. Originality/value OGD is an information policy with near global relevance and increasing application. Practitioners and scholars alike have used the concept of an “ecosystem” to guide their approach to implementing this policy and to theorizing its scope and benefits. The international comparison is original and adds to the current understanding of an ecosystem approach to OGD.

[1]  M. Janssen,et al.  Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users , 2014 .

[2]  Rui Pedro Lourenço,et al.  An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Jo Bates,et al.  The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers , 2012 .

[5]  Frank L. K. Ohemeng,et al.  One way traffic: The open data initiative project and the need for an effective demand side initiative in Ghana , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[7]  Kiev Gama,et al.  Towards Ecosystems based on Open Data as a Service , 2014, ICEIS.

[8]  G. Bowker,et al.  An International Framework to Promote Access to Data , 2004, Science.

[9]  Lyudmila Bershadskaya,et al.  Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  James A. Hendler,et al.  TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems , 2011, J. Web Semant..

[11]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Transparency and openness in government: a system dynamics perspective , 2011, ICEGOV '11.

[12]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda , 2012, Future Internet.

[13]  Lluís Esteve Casellas Serra,et al.  The mapping, selecting and opening of data , 2014 .

[14]  Michel L. Ehrenhard,et al.  Open government objectives and participation motivations , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  Sandra Braman Defining information: An approach for policymakers , 1989 .

[17]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data , 2011, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[19]  Richard Rose,et al.  Comparing Forms of Comparative Analysis , 1991 .

[20]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems , 2014, Inf. Polity.