Computer‐based measurement of letter and word acuity

Determining causes of poor reading ability is an important step in trying to ameliorate reading performance in low‐vision patients. One important parameter is word acuity. The principal aim of the current study is to develop a method to reliably measure acuities for isolated lowercase letters and words of differing length that can be used to test low‐vision patients. Using isolated stimuli means that testing is relatively free of potential crowding and/or distracting attentional effects from surrounding words, it is unambiguous which stimulus subjects are trying to read and response times can be recorded for each stimulus. Across a series of experiments, subjects with normal vision were asked to read isolated lowercase single letters and lowercase words of 4, 7 and 10 letters, in separate tests. Acuities for uppercase Sloan letters were also measured to provide a reference, as they are commonly used to measure visual acuity. Each test was based upon the design principles and scoring procedures used in the Bailey–Lovie and ETDRS charts. Acuities for uppercase Sloan letters were found to be equivalent whether measured using ETDRS charts or the computer‐based method. Measurement of acuities for lowercase single letters and lowercase words of 4, 7 and 10 letters had a reliability that was no worse than acuities for uppercase Sloan letters. Lowercase word acuities were essentially independent of word length. Acuities for single lowercase letters and lowercase words were slightly better than uppercase Sloan letters acuity. Optimal processing of lowercase single letters and 4‐, 7‐ and 10‐letter words occurred at character sizes that were at least 0.2–0.40 log MAR above acuity threshold, i.e. between 1.5 and 3 times threshold acuity for that particular stimulus. In general, critical character sizes appear similar across word lengths as progressive increases or decreases in these values were not observed as a function of the number of letters in the stimulus. We conclude that a computer‐based method of stimulus presentation can be used to obtain highly repeatable measures of acuity for lowercase single letters and lowercase words in normal vision.

[1]  I L Bailey,et al.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  T. Nazir,et al.  Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Arthur Linksz DESIGNATION OF VISUAL ACUITY , 1943 .

[5]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  R. Jacobs Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery , 1979, Vision Research.

[7]  F W Fitzke,et al.  Use of scrolled text in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope to assess reading performance at different retinal locations * , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[8]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[11]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Determining magnification for reading with low vision , 2002, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[12]  B Winn,et al.  Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  S. Cousens,et al.  The effect of optical defocus on the test-retest variability of visual acuity measurements. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  A Carkeet,et al.  Modeling logMAR Visual Acuity Scores: Effects of Termination Rules and Alternative Forced-Choice Options , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Wolfgang Radner,et al.  The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[17]  I L Bailey,et al.  Repeatability of Visual Acuity Measurement , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  R. Yee,et al.  The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  J. Siderov,et al.  Variability of measurements of visual acuity in a large eye clinic. , 1999, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[20]  R. Rabbetts,et al.  Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  Ulrike Willinger,et al.  Eine neue Lesetafel* zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit , 1998 .

[22]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Montip Tiensuwan,et al.  Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[25]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Eye Movements in Reading , 1999 .

[26]  Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski,et al.  Fixation behavior and reading ability in macular scotoma: Assessed by Tuebingen manual perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy , 1996 .

[27]  M Velikay-Parel,et al.  [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed]. , 1998, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[28]  Ian L. Bailey,et al.  Task Complexity and Visual Acuity in Senile Macular Degeneration , 1981 .

[29]  K Knoblauch,et al.  Reading with fixed and variable character pitch. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  C N French The UMIST Eye System. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  M. Kalloniatis,et al.  Word Acuity Threshold as a Function of Contrast and Retinal Eccentricity , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  R F Hess,et al.  Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  S. Trauzettel-Klosinski,et al.  Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters , 1998, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[36]  A Arditi,et al.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  James S Wolffsohn,et al.  Predicting prescribed magnification * , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[38]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[40]  Ugo Menchini,et al.  Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  Boris New,et al.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[42]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[43]  Jan E. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Repeatability and Intercorrelations of Standard Vision Tests as a Function of Age , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[44]  A. Kooijman,et al.  Low vision : research and new developments in rehabilitation , 1994 .

[45]  J E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Oral and silent reading performance with macular degeneration. , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[46]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.