The results of a numerical simulation of open‐channel flow of Bingham fluids provide improved capabilities for analyzing muddy debris flows and their depositis, and for routing debris flows. Because of limitations of the phenomenonological Bingham model, results are deemed applicable to mud‐rich debris flows only. Most published field estimates of debris‐flow rheological (Bingham) properties depend on application to natural channels of analytical solutions for flow through channels with either circular or very wide channel cross‐sections. Lack of a general solution for flow of Bingham fluids in channels with realistic shapes has restricted capabilities in debris‐flow modeling and field data analysis. Numerical solutions permit generalization and extension of analytical solutions to channels of arbitrary cross‐sectional form without loss of accuracy. The numerical model (FIDAP) utilizes a well established finite‐element formulation of the non‐Newtonian fluid flow problem and reproduces available analytical solutions nearly exactly. A regression analysis of model results constrains general, easily applied equations that give discharge and plug velocity as functions of channel geometry, channel slope, debris bulk density, viscosity, and yield strength. These empirical equations are suitable for back‐calculation of debris‐flow viscosity from field data, engineering analysis, and for incorporation into one‐ and two‐dimensional debris‐flow routing models. An analysis of debris‐flow rheology on the basis of new field observations in Owens Valley, California, utilizing this method yields the most reliable field estimates of debris‐flow yield strength‐viscosity pairs to date. These new field estimates corroborate trends seen in recent laboratory studies and suggest that these trends may be extrapolated to field scale.
[1]
Roger I. Tanner,et al.
Numerical analysis of three-dimensional Bingham plastic flow
,
1992
.
[2]
R. Iverson,et al.
Dynamic Pore-Pressure Fluctuations in Rapidly Shearing Granular Materials
,
1989,
Science.
[3]
S. Savage,et al.
The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline
,
1989,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[4]
C. Mei,et al.
Slow parallel flows of a water-granule mixture under gravity, part II: Examples of free surface and channel flows
,
1986
.
[5]
M. Malin,et al.
Rheological properties of mudflows associated with the spring 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens Volcano, Washington
,
1981
.
[6]
Thomas C. Pierson,et al.
A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment-water flows
,
1987
.
[7]
Philippe Coussot,et al.
On the behavior of fine mud suspensions
,
1994
.
[8]
L. Jian,et al.
The main features of the mudflow in Jiang-Jia Ravine
,
1983
.
[9]
J. Oldroyd,et al.
Two-dimensional plastic flow of a Bingham solid
,
1947,
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[10]
John E. Costa,et al.
Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows
,
1984
.