How uncertainty analysis of streamflow data can reduce costs and promote robust decisions in water management applications

Streamflow data are used for important environmental and economic decisions, such as specifying and regulating minimum flows, managing water supplies, and planning for flood hazards. Despite significant uncertainty in most flow data, the flow series for these applications are often communicated and used without uncertainty information. In this commentary, we argue that proper analysis of uncertainty in river flow data can reduce costs and promote robust conclusions in water management applications. We substantiate our argument by providing case studies from Norway and New Zealand where streamflow uncertainty analysis has uncovered economic costs in the hydropower industry, improved public acceptance of a controversial water management policy, and tested the accuracy of water quality trends. We discuss the need for practical uncertainty assessment tools that generate multiple flow series realizations rather than simple error bounds. Although examples of such tools are in development, considerable barriers for uncertainty analysis and communication still exist for practitioners, and future research must aim to provide easier access and usability of uncertainty estimates. We conclude that flow uncertainty analysis is critical for good water management decisions.

[1]  G. McBride,et al.  Water quality in New Zealand rivers: current state and trends , 2016 .

[2]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall‐runoff model calibration and discharge predictions , 2010 .

[3]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data , 1982 .

[4]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrological signatures for gauged and ungauged catchments , 2016 .

[5]  Oswald Marinoni,et al.  Water planning in a changing climate: Joint application of cost utility analysis and modern portfolio theory , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  J. Freer,et al.  Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality , 2012 .

[7]  K. Oberg,et al.  Computing discharge using the index velocity method , 2012 .

[8]  H. McMillan,et al.  Validation of a national hydrological model , 2016 .

[9]  Anne-Catherine Favre,et al.  Dynamic rating curve assessment for hydrometric stations and computation of the associated uncertainties: Quality and station management indicators , 2014 .

[10]  Asgeir Petersen-Øverleir,et al.  Bayesian Rating Curve Inference as a Streamflow Data Quality Assessment Tool , 2009 .

[11]  Hilary McMillan,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrological signatures , 2015 .

[12]  Michel Lang,et al.  Regional methods for trend detection: Assessing field significance and regional consistency , 2008 .

[13]  Andreas Scheidegger,et al.  Considering rating curve uncertainty in water level predictions , 2013 .

[14]  F. Branger,et al.  Combining hydraulic knowledge and uncertain gaugings in the estimation of hydrometric rating curves: A Bayesian approach , 2014 .

[15]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions , 2008 .

[16]  I. Steinsland,et al.  Effects of uncertainties in hydrological modelling. A case study of a mountainous catchment in Southern Norway , 2016 .

[17]  P. J. Smith,et al.  A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations , 2015, Water resources research.

[18]  Asgeir Petersen-Øverleir,et al.  Bayesian methods for estimating multi-segment discharge rating curves , 2009 .

[19]  Michel Lang,et al.  Extrapolation of rating curves by hydraulic modelling, with application to flood frequency analysis , 2010 .