Governance, Transparency and the Collaborative Design of Open Data Collaboration Platforms: Understanding Barriers, Options, and Needs

Developments in open data have prompted a range of proposals and innovations in the domain of governance and public administration. Within the democratic tradition, transparency is seen as a fundamental element of democratic governance. While the use of open government data has the potential to enhance transparency and trust in government, realising any ideal of transparent democratic governance implies responding to a range of sociotechnical design challenges. In order to address these design challenges it is essential to adopt an interdisciplinary and stakeholder-engaged approach to research and innovation. In the current study, we describe a contextualist approach to the design of an open data collaboration platform in the context of an EU innovation project, focused on enhancing transparency and collaboration between citizens and public administrators through the use of open government data. We report on a collective intelligence scenario-based design process that has shaped the development of open data platform requirements and ongoing system engineering and evaluation work. Stakeholders across five pilot sites identified barriers to accessing, understanding, and using open data, and options to overcome these barriers across three broad categories: government and organisational issues; technical, data, and resource issues; and training and engagement issues. Stakeholders also expressed a broad variety of user needs across three domains: information needs; social-collaborative needs; and understandability, usability, and decision-making needs. Similarities and differences across sites are highlighted along with implications for open data platform design.

[1]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[2]  Alon Peled,et al.  When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  Requirements engineering for e-Government services: A citizen-centric approach and case study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Saifullah M. Dewan,et al.  Towards Conceptualizing Information Transparency and its Role in Internet Consumers' Concerns: A Literature Review , 2014 .

[5]  John N. Warfield,et al.  A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through Systems Design , 1994 .

[6]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  Consulting with Citizens in the Design of Wellbeing Measures and Policies: Lessons from a Systems Science Application , 2014, Social Indicators Research.

[7]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Adegboyega Ojo,et al.  Deploying governance networks for societal challenges , 2016, Government Information Quarterly.

[9]  John N. Warfield,et al.  An Introduction to Systems Science , 2006 .

[10]  Cromer Il,et al.  Forum on the future of pediatric nursing: looking toward the 21st century. , 1988 .

[11]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[12]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Online Communities and Open Innovation , 2008 .

[13]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Core entrepreneurial competencies and their interdependencies: insights from a study of Irish and Iranian entrepreneurs, university students and academics , 2017 .

[14]  A. Meijer Understanding modern transparency , 2009 .

[15]  Michael J. Hogan,et al.  Realizing the Innovation Potentials from Open Data: Stakeholders' Perspectives on the Desired Affordances of Open Data Environment , 2016, PRO-VE.

[16]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Information Policy and Social Media: Framing Government—Citizen Web 2.0 Interactions , 2012 .

[18]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Designing a Second Generation of Open Data Platforms: Integrating Open Data and Social Media , 2014, EGOV.

[20]  Mike Cohn,et al.  User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development , 2004 .

[21]  S. Pepper World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence , 1942 .

[22]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Developing and Testing a Theoretical Framework for Computer‐Mediated Transparency of Local Governments , 2012 .

[23]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving , 1995 .

[24]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Rui Pedro Lourenço,et al.  Open Government Portals Assessment: A Transparency for Accountability Perspective , 2013, EGOV.

[26]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  A. Meijer Government Transparency in Historical Perspective: From the Ancient Regime to Open Data in The Netherlands , 2015 .

[28]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e‐Government , 2011 .

[29]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  Guidelines For Computer-Assisted Group Problem Solving , 1992 .

[30]  Alexander N. Christakis,et al.  Correspondence: Systems profiles , 1987 .

[31]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[32]  David Heald,et al.  Varieties of transparency , 2006 .

[33]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Five reasons for scenario-based design , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[34]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR TRIBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE MODEL FOR CONSENSUS BUILDING , 1991 .

[35]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Owen M. Harney,et al.  Using interactive management to facilitate a student-centred conceptualisation of critical thinking: a case study , 2014 .

[37]  Jérôme Denis,et al.  Exploration, Extraction and ‘Rawification’. The Shaping of Transparency in the Back Rooms of Open Data , 2014 .

[38]  J. Fox,et al.  The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability , 2007 .

[39]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[40]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  M. Hogan,et al.  Enhancing wellbeing: An emerging model of the adaptive functions of music listening , 2016 .

[42]  L J Hayes,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR FINDING THE PHILOSOPHICAL CORE : A REVIEW OF STEPHEN C . PEPPER ' S WORLD HYPOTHESES : A STUDY IN EVIDENCE ' , 2005 .

[43]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Citizen-centered e-government services: benefits, costs, and research needs , 2008, DG.O.