A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanics

Our purpose in this paper is to delineate an ontology for quantum mechanics that results adequate to the formalism of the theory. We will restrict our aim to the search of an ontology that expresses the conceptual content of the recently proposed modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, according to which the domain referred to by non-relativistic quantum mechanics is an ontology of properties. The usual strategy in the literature has been to focus on only one of the interpretive problems of the theory and to design an interpretation to solve it, leaving aside the remaining difficulties. On the contrary, our aim in the present work is to formulate a “global” solution, according to which different problems can be adequately tackled in terms of a single ontology populated of properties, in which systems are bundles of properties. In particular, we will conceive indistinguishability between bundles as a relation derived from indistinguishability between properties, and we will show that states, when operating on combinations of indistinguishable bundles, act as if they were symmetric with no need of a symmetrization postulate.

[1]  G. D. Francia,et al.  IDENTITY QUESTIONS FROM QUANTUM THEORY , 1995 .

[2]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  An Intensional Schrödinger Logic , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[3]  M. L. Dalla Chiara,et al.  Individuals, Kinds and Names in Physics , 1993 .

[4]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  Set-Theoretical Models for Quantum Systems , 1999 .

[5]  Gary M. Hardegree The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1976, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[6]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 1974 .

[7]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics , 2002 .

[8]  Olivier Darrigol,et al.  Erwin Schrödinger : philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics , 1992 .

[9]  J. Butterfield Interpretation and identity in quantum theory , 1993 .

[10]  Robert Olkiewicz,et al.  The Schrödinger problem , 1994 .

[11]  Paul Teller,et al.  Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics , 1992, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[12]  M. Bunge Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[13]  Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Reexamined , 1970 .

[14]  Dennis Dieks Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2007 .

[15]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  Paradigms and Paradoxes: The philosophical challenge of the quantum domain , 1976 .

[16]  Katherine Brading,et al.  Symmetries and invariances in classical physics , 2005 .

[17]  Décio Krause,et al.  Schrödinger logics , 1994, Stud Logica.

[18]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: Modal Interpretation and Galilean Transformations , 2009 .

[19]  Paul Teller,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View , 1991 .

[20]  J. M. Lévy-Leblond,et al.  The pedagogical role and epistemological significance of group theory in quantum mechanics , 1974 .

[21]  L. Ballentine Quantum mechanics : a modern development , 1998 .

[22]  Alfred Tarski,et al.  Relational selves as self-affirmational resources , 2008 .

[23]  Décio Krause,et al.  On a Quasi-Set Theory , 1992, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[24]  S. French,et al.  Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis , 2006 .

[25]  Giovanna Corsi,et al.  Bridging the gap: philosophy, mathematics, and physics , 1993 .

[26]  William Kneale,et al.  The development of logic , 1963 .

[27]  Roberto Giuntini,et al.  Language, Quantum, Music , 1999 .

[28]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[29]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0610121.

[30]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics , 2010 .

[31]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as a Kind of “Atomic” Interpretation , 2011 .

[32]  Kostas Gavroglu,et al.  Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community , 1995 .

[33]  Elena Castellani Interpreting bodies : classical and quantum objects in modern physics , 1998 .

[34]  Harvey R. Brown,et al.  The Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics in the case of external fields , 1999 .

[35]  N L Harshman,et al.  Galilean and dynamical invariance of entanglement in particle scattering. , 2007, Physical review letters.