Dynamics in the creation and depreciation of knowledge, and the returns to research:

Econometric studies of the effects of research on productivity have typically imposed arbitrary restrictions on the length and shape of the R&D lag profile. These restrictions are likely to have biased up both the measured effects of R&D on productivity and the estimated rates of return to research. This paper argues that the useful stock of public knowledge depreciates, if at all, only gradually, and we use this notion to develop a new model, which we test using data on aggregate U.S. agriculture. We reject the conventional specification in favor of a more flexible, dynamic, alternative model, in which the impact of R&D on productivity lasts much longer than in previous studies. Consequently, the real, marginal rate of return to public agricultural R&D in the United States is estimated to be less than 10 percent per annum, much smaller than the typical rates of return reported in scores of previous studies, based on conceptually flawed and inappropriately restrictive dynamic specifications. We show that conventional approaches using the same data would have resulted in a much greater (biased) estimate of the rate of return to research.

[1]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[2]  James F. Oehmke,et al.  Science under scarcity: Principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting , 1996 .

[3]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Economic Benefits from Research: An Example from Agriculture , 1979, Science.

[4]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[5]  G. Fox Is the United States Really Underinvesting in Agricultural Research , 1985 .

[6]  Z. Griliches R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[7]  W. Huffman,et al.  Supply and Demand Functions for Multiproduct U.S. Cash Grain Farms: Biases Caused by Research and Other Policies , 1989 .

[8]  I. Prucha,et al.  Estimation of the Depreciation Rate of Physical and R&D Capital in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector , 1993 .

[9]  Estimating Returns to Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching at the State Level , 1983, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[10]  Robert J. Myers,et al.  Regime shifts and technology diffusion in crop yield growth paths with an application to maize yields in Zimbabwe , 1997 .

[11]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Agricultural Research and Development: Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions , 1996 .

[12]  B. Beattie Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting , 1995 .

[13]  J. Chavas,et al.  A Nonparametric Analysis of the Influence of Research on Agricultural Productivity , 1992 .

[14]  Maury E. Bredahl,et al.  The Productivity And Allocation Of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations , 1976 .

[15]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[16]  R. Evenson The Contribution of Agricultural Research to Production , 1967 .

[17]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  P. Bottomley,et al.  IS PUBLICLY FUNDED AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH EXCESSIVE , 1988 .

[19]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  The Development of U.S. Agricultural Research and Education: An Economic Perspective , 1987 .

[20]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[21]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Science for Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective , 1993 .

[22]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Two Blades of Grass: Research for U.S. Agriculture , 1992 .

[23]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s , 1985 .

[24]  F. M. Scherer,et al.  The lag structure of returns to research and development , 1982 .

[25]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector , 1998 .

[26]  R. Perrin,et al.  Prices and Productivity in Agriculture , 1993 .

[27]  R. Echeverría Assessing the impact of agricultural research. , 1990 .

[28]  Jora R. Minasian,et al.  Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return , 1969 .

[29]  P. Pardey,et al.  Making Science Pay: The Economics of Agricultural R&D Policy , 1996 .

[30]  D. Jorgenson The Economic Theory of Replacement and Depreciation , 1974 .

[31]  J. Alston,et al.  Producer Surplus without Apology? Evaluating Investments in RD* , 1997 .

[32]  Bruce T. Grimm,et al.  A Satellite Account for Research and Development , 1994 .

[33]  P. Pardey,et al.  Causal Relationships between Public Sector Agricultural Research Expenditures and Output , 1989 .

[34]  Gregory D. Adams,et al.  THE RETURNS TO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN MAINE: THE CASE OF A SMALL NORTHEASTERN EXPERIMENT STATION , 1991 .

[35]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  COINTEGRATION, AND CAUSALITY: EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGRICULTURAL AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1994 .