The Relationships of Family, Perceived Digital Competence and Attitude, and Learning Agility in Sustainable Student Engagement in Higher Education

College students are often assumed to be digitally fluent as they are “digital natives”, owing to their exposure to digital technologies from an early age. Furthermore, it is assumed that this digital competence is likely to prepare them for learning in college. However, it has been observed that current college students who are “digital natives” may or may not effectively apply digital technologies during their college education. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of college students’ prior digital experiences, particularly their families’ influence, on their in-college digital competence and attitude, and by extension, on student engagement. A total of 381 university students were surveyed in this study. Data was obtained from a self-administered, online survey and analyzed using partial least squares, which also evaluated the research model. According to the findings of this study, students’ positive prior digital experience significantly influences their perceived digital competence and their attitude toward digital technologies. In addition, our research also indicates that college students’ perceived digital competence and attitudes are mediated by their learning agility, which is the ability to continuously learn and the willingness to apply acquired knowledge. This article may thus act as a springboard for further empirical research, as well as for examining the nature of students’ prior and positive experiences and learning agility in digital competencies.

[1]  Michael M. Lombardo,et al.  High Potentials as High Learners , 2000 .

[2]  S. Christenson,et al.  Jingle, Jangle, 1 and Conceptual Haziness 2 : Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct , 2012 .

[3]  Fernando Guzmán-Simón,et al.  Undergraduate students' perspectives on digital competence and academic literacy in a Spanish University , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Why Bother Theorizing Adolescents' Online Literacies for Classroom Practice and Research? , 2008 .

[5]  Hong Kian Sam,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes toward the Internet: A Study among Undergraduates in Unimas , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Harminder Singh,et al.  Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[7]  C. Tang,et al.  The Development and Validation of the International Aids Questionnaire-Chinese Version (Iaq-C) , 1999 .

[8]  Charles Crook,et al.  Addressing Research at the Intersection of Academic Literacies and New Technology. , 2005 .

[9]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  A. Qayyum,et al.  Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is Not the Issue , 2011 .

[11]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Effects of Effort Attributional Feedback on Children's Perceived Self-Efficacy and Achievement , 1982 .

[12]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Students’ Sourcing While Reading and Writing From Multiple Web Documents , 2014 .

[13]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[14]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Do Computers Enhance or Detract from Student Learning? , 2001 .

[15]  L. Schreiner,et al.  The Engaged Learning Index: Implications for Faculty Development. , 2011 .

[16]  Siegle Del,et al.  Laptop Computers and Multimedia and Presentation Software , 2001 .

[17]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[18]  Shih-hsien Yang,et al.  Exploring College Students' Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Mobile Learning , 2012 .

[19]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[20]  Wan Ng,et al.  Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[21]  George D. Kuh,et al.  The Relationship between Computer and Information Technology Use, Selected Learning and Personal Development Outcomes, and Other College Experiences. , 2001 .

[22]  Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al.  Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[24]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[25]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Turning Work into Play: Implications for Microcomputer Software Training , 1993 .

[26]  Hyewon Lee,et al.  From Motivation to Engagement: The Role of Effort Regulation of Virtual High School Students in Mathematics Courses , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[27]  Jeffrey Alan Greene,et al.  Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Boaventura DaCosta,et al.  The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology , 2010 .

[31]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[32]  Ronnie Jia.  Computer playfulness, Internet dependency and their relationships with online activity types and student academic performance. , 2012, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[33]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Computer experience and computer anxiety , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  M. Barak,et al.  Wireless Laptops as Means For Promoting Active Learning In Large Lecture Halls , 2006 .

[35]  James L. Fitch,et al.  Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution , 2004 .

[36]  George D. Kuh.  Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2001 .

[37]  W. Briggs,et al.  A Measure of College Student Course Engagement , 2005 .

[38]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  Overcoming digital divides in higher education: Digital literacy beyond Facebook , 2015, New Media Soc..

[39]  Ola Knutsson,et al.  Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[40]  Kerri-Lee Krause,et al.  Students’ engagement in first‐year university , 2008 .

[41]  Sarah K. Howard,et al.  Student rules: Exploring patterns of students' computer-efficacy and engagement with digital technologies in learning , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Aytekin Isman,et al.  HOW DOES STUDENT ABILITY AND SELF-EFFICACY AFFECT THE USAGE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY? , 2009 .

[43]  K. P. D. Meuse,et al.  LEARNING AGILITY: A CONSTRUCT WHOSE TIME HAS COME , 2010 .

[44]  H. Kim,et al.  College Students’ Digital Readiness for Academic Engagement (DRAE) Scale: Scale Development and Validation , 2018, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.

[45]  Search for feedback information and effort regulation during task performance , 1977 .

[46]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[47]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[48]  Meg Murray,et al.  Unraveling the Digital Literacy Paradox: How Higher Education Fails at the Fourth Literacy , 2014 .

[49]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[50]  Carolyn A. Martin.  From high maintenance to high productivity , 2005 .

[51]  Joanna Goode,et al.  The digital identity divide: how technology knowledge impacts college students , 2010, New Media Soc..

[52]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Gender and computers: similarities and differences in Iranian college students' attitudes toward computers , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Del Siegle,et al.  Laptop Computers and Multimedia and Presentation Software: Their Effects on Student Achievement in Anatomy and Physiology , 2001 .

[54]  Jillian Kinzie,et al.  Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence , 2008 .

[55]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[56]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[57]  J. Connell,et al.  Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. , 1991 .

[58]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .