A Regional Classification Scheme for Estimating Reference Water Quality in Streams Using Land-Use-Adjusted Spatial Regression-Tree Analysis

Various approaches are used to subdivide large areas into regions containing streams that have similar reference or background water quality and that respond similarly to different factors. For many applications, such as establishing reference conditions, it is preferable to use physical characteristics that are not affected by human activities to delineate these regions. However, most approaches, such as ecoregion classifications, rely on land use to delineate regions or have difficulties compensating for the effects of land use. Land use not only directly affects water quality, but it is often correlated with the factors used to define the regions. In this article, we describe modifications to SPARTA (spatial regression-tree analysis), a relatively new approach applied to water-quality and environmental characteristic data to delineate zones with similar factors affecting water quality. In this modified approach, land-use-adjusted (residualized) water quality and environmental characteristics are computed for each site. Regression-tree analysis is applied to the residualized data to determine the most statistically important environmental characteristics describing the distribution of a specific water-quality constituent. Geographic information for small basins throughout the study area is then used to subdivide the area into relatively homogeneous environmental water-quality zones. For each zone, commonly used approaches are subsequently used to define its reference water quality and how its water quality responds to changes in land use. SPARTA is used to delineate zones of similar reference concentrations of total phosphorus and suspended sediment throughout the upper Midwestern part of the United States.

[1]  W. Dodds,et al.  A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans , 2004 .

[2]  W. Krug,et al.  Average Annual Runoff in the United States, 1951-80 , 1985 .

[3]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Robert J. Gilliom,et al.  REGRESSION MODELS FOR ESTIMATING HERBICIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN U.S. STREAMS FROM WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS 1 , 2001 .

[5]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  ERF1_2 -- Enhanced River Reach File 2.0 , 2003 .

[6]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[7]  Md. Salequzzaman,et al.  Ecoregions: A Spatial Framework for Environmental Management , 2005 .

[8]  Wayne S. Davis,et al.  Biological assessment and criteria : tools for water resource planning and decision making , 1995 .

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[10]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[11]  F. P. Kapinos,et al.  State hydrologic unit maps , 1984 .

[12]  David A. Pennell Surficial deposits and materials in the eastern and central United States (east of 102 degrees west longitude) , 2003 .

[13]  G. Schwarz,et al.  State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base for the Conterminous United States , 1995 .

[14]  D. Soller,et al.  Digital representation of a map showing the thickness and character of Quaternary sediments in the glaciated United States east of the Rocky Mountains , 1998 .

[15]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  ERF1 -- Enhanced River Reach File 1.2 , 1999 .

[16]  D. Robertson,et al.  Environmental Water-Quality Zones for Streams: A Regional Classification Scheme , 2003, Environmental management.

[17]  Robert Perciasepe,et al.  National Strategy For The Development Of Regional Nutrient Criteria , 1998 .