Classical and Nonclassical Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Molecules Exhibit Subtle Conformational Differences That Affect Binding to CD8αα*

The cell surface molecules CD4 and CD8 greatly enhance the sensitivity of T-cell antigen recognition, acting as “co-receptors” by binding to the same major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules as the T-cell receptor (TCR). Here we use surface plasmon resonance to study the binding of CD8αα to class I MHC molecules. CD8αα bound the classical MHC molecules HLA-A*0201, -A*1101, -B*3501, and -C*0702 with dissociation constants (K d ) of 90–220 μm, a range of affinities distinctly lower than that of TCR/peptide-MHC interaction. We suggest such affinities apply to most CD8αα/classical class I MHC interactions and may be optimal for T-cell recognition. In contrast, CD8αα bound both HLA-A*6801 and B*4801 with a significantly lower affinity (≥1 mm), consistent with the finding that interactions with these alleles are unable to mediate cell-cell adhesion. Interestingly, CD8αα bound normally to the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G (K d ∼150 μm), but only weakly to the natural killer cell receptor ligand HLA-E (K d ≥ 1 mm). Site-directed mutagenesis experiments revealed that variation in CD8αα binding affinity can be explained by amino acid differences within the α3 domain. Taken together with crystallographic studies, these results indicate that subtle conformational changes in the solvent exposed α3 domain loop (residues 223–229) can account for the differential ability of both classical and nonclassical class I MHC molecules to bind CD8.

[1]  D. Stuart,et al.  Production, crystallization, and preliminary X‐ray analysis of the human MHC class Ib molecule HLA‐E , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  M. Petzl-Erler,et al.  Interactions of HLA-B*4801 with peptide and CD8. , 1997, Tissue antigens.

[3]  P. Parham,et al.  Polymorphism in the α3 domain of HLA-A molecules affects binding to CD8 , 1989, Nature.

[4]  P. Parham,et al.  Nature of polymorphism in HLA-A, -B, and -C molecules. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Parham,et al.  Cell-cell adhesion mediated by CD8 and MHC class I molecules , 1988, Nature.

[6]  G. Gao,et al.  Assembly and crystallization of the complex between the human T cell coreceptor CD8α homodimer and HLA‐A2 , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  D I Stuart,et al.  Crystal structure of cat muscle pyruvate kinase at a resolution of 2.6 A. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Bell,et al.  Structure and function of the human MHC class Ib molecules HLA‐E, HLA‐F and HLA‐G , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[9]  F. Studier,et al.  Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Nonclassical HLA-G molecules are classical peptide presenters , 1996, Current Biology.

[11]  L. Lanier,et al.  CD94/NKG2 is the predominant inhibitory receptor involved in recognition of HLA-G by decidual and peripheral blood NK cells. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[12]  T. Potter,et al.  Recognition by CD8 on cytotoxic T lymphocytes is ablated by several substitutions in the class I alpha 3 domain: CD8 and the T-cell receptor recognize the same class I molecule. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Bell,et al.  Engagement of a T cell receptor by major histocompatibility complex irrespective of peptide , 1997, European journal of immunology.

[14]  D. Wiley,et al.  HLA-A2-peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  L. Hood,et al.  Negative and positive selection of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes affected by the α3 domain of MHC I molecules , 1991, Nature.

[16]  D. Littman The structure of the CD4 and CD8 genes. , 1987, Annual review of immunology.

[17]  D. Stuart,et al.  Structural features impose tight peptide binding specificity in the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-E. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[18]  A. Smolyar,et al.  Structural Basis of CD8 Coreceptor Function Revealed by Crystallographic Analysis of a Murine CD8αα Ectodomain Fragment in Complex with H-2Kb , 1998 .

[19]  P. Parham,et al.  A binding site for the T-cell co-receptor CD8 on the α3 domain of HLA-A2 , 1990, Nature.

[20]  R M Esnouf,et al.  Further additions to MolScript version 1.4, including reading and contouring of electron-density maps. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[21]  T. Mak,et al.  CD8 is needed for development of cytotoxic T but not helper T cells , 1991, Cell.

[22]  N. Holmes,et al.  Resistance of HLA-G and HLA-A2 transfectants to lysis by decidual NK cells. , 1994, Cellular immunology.

[23]  S. Christmas,et al.  Phenotypic and functional cellular differences between human CD3- decidual and peripheral blood leukocytes. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[24]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. , 1999, Immunity.

[25]  J. Bell,et al.  HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C , 1998, Nature.

[26]  C. Janeway The T cell receptor as a multicomponent signalling machine: CD4/CD8 coreceptors and CD45 in T cell activation. , 1992, Annual review of immunology.

[27]  S. Meuer,et al.  Expression of different CD8 isoforms on distinct human lymphocyte subpopulations , 1991, European journal of immunology.

[28]  G. Evans,et al.  Co-engagement of CD8 with the T cell receptor is required for negative selection , 1991, Nature.

[29]  P. Kavathas,et al.  Cell-cell adhesion mediated by CD8 and human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen G, a nonclassical major histocompatibility complex class 1 molecule on cytotrophoblasts , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[30]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[31]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  T cell receptor and coreceptor CD8 alphaalpha bind peptide-MHC independently and with distinct kinetics. , 1999, Immunity.

[32]  P. Parham,et al.  CD8 independence and specificity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes restricted by HLA-Aw68. 1 , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D I Stuart,et al.  An altered position of the alpha 2 helix of MHC class I is revealed by the crystal structure of HLA-B*3501. , 1996, Immunity.

[34]  D. Littman,et al.  Requirement for CD8-major histocompatibility complex class I interaction in positive and negative selection of developing T cells , 1992, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  A. Kruisbeek,et al.  CD4 and CD8 act as co-receptors during thymic selection of the T cell repertoire. , 1991, Seminars in immunology.

[36]  J. Bajorath,et al.  The membrane-bound and soluble forms of HLA-G bind identical sets of endogenous peptides but differ with respect to TAP association. , 1995, Immunity.