Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Levels of recombination vary among species, among chromosomes within species, and among regions within chromosomes in mammals. This heterogeneity may affect levels of diversity, efficiency of selection, and genome composition, as well as have practical consequences for the genetic mapping of traits. We compared the genetic maps to the genome sequence assemblies of rat, mouse, and human to estimate local recombination rates across these genomes. Humans have greater overall levels of recombination, as well as greater variance. In rat and mouse, the size of the chromosome and proximity to telomere have less effect on local recombination rate than in human. At the chromosome level, rat and mouse X chromosomes have the lowest recombination rates, whereas human chromosome X does not show the same pattern. In all species, local recombination rate is significantly correlated with several sequence variables, including GC%, CpG density, repetitive elements, and the neutral mutation rate, with some pronounced differences between species. Recombination rate in one species is not strongly correlated with the rate in another, when comparing homologous syntenic blocks of the genome. This comparative approach provides additional insight into the causes and consequences of genomic heterogeneity in recombination.

[1]  Lisa M. D'Souza,et al.  Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution , 2004, Nature.

[2]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. , 2004, Genome research.

[3]  Norman Arnheim,et al.  Hot and cold spots of recombination in the human genome: the reason we should find them and how this can be achieved. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  G. Marais,et al.  Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  S. Pääbo,et al.  A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  David Haussler,et al.  Integration of the cytogenetic map with the draft human genome sequence. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[7]  David Haussler,et al.  Combining phylogenetic and hidden Markov models in biosequence analysis , 2003, RECOMB '03.

[8]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  High‐resolution sperm typing of meiotic recombination in the mouse MHC Eβ gene , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[9]  J. Montoya-Burgos,et al.  Recombination explains isochores in mammalian genomes. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  David Haussler,et al.  Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution. , 2003, Genome research.

[11]  D. Haussler,et al.  Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. , 2003, Genome research.

[12]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[13]  M. Nachman,et al.  Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[14]  J. Merker,et al.  Context dependence of meiotic recombination hotspots in yeast: the relationship between recombination activity of a reporter construct and base composition. , 2002, Genetics.

[15]  J. Britton-Davidian,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of recombination: comparison of chiasma distribution patterns in standard and robertsonian populations of the house mouse. , 2002, Genetics.

[16]  I. Jackson,et al.  The promises and problems of linkage analysis by using the current canine genome map , 2002, Mammalian Genome.

[17]  A. Betancourt,et al.  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Carrington,et al.  High-resolution patterns of meiotic recombination across the human major histocompatibility complex. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  P. Hunt,et al.  Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. , 2002, Genetics.

[20]  G. Piganeau,et al.  Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Human genome sequence variation and the influence of gene history, mutation and recombination , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[22]  C. Sapienza,et al.  X chromosome effect on maternal recombination and meiotic drive in the mouse. , 2002, Genetics.

[23]  John A Birdsell,et al.  Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  Martin J Lercher,et al.  Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[26]  D. Gudbjartsson,et al.  A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  On the abundance and distribution of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  The human genome browser at UCSC. , 2002, Genome research.

[29]  J. Slate,et al.  A deer (subfamily Cervinae) genetic linkage map and the evolution of ruminant genomes. , 2002, Genetics.

[30]  W. J. Kent,et al.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool. , 2002, Genome research.

[31]  Manolo Gouy,et al.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. , 2002, Genome research.

[32]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[33]  C. Pál,et al.  Does the recombination rate affect the efficiency of purifying selection? The yeast genome provides a partial answer. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  L. Hurst,et al.  Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[36]  M. Noor,et al.  Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome. , 2001, Genetics.

[37]  M. Nachman,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms and recombination rate in humans. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[38]  M. Bihoreau,et al.  A high-resolution consensus linkage map of the rat, integrating radiation hybrid and genetic maps. , 2001, Genomics.

[39]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  The evolution of isochores , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  O. Nerman,et al.  Rat-mouse and rat-human comparative maps based on gene homology and high-resolution zoo-FISH. , 2001, Genomics.

[41]  S. Hiendleder,et al.  An enhanced linkage map of the sheep genome comprising more than 1000 loci. , 2001, Genome research.

[42]  A. Clark,et al.  Local rates of recombination are positively correlated with GC content in the human genome. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[43]  T. Petes,et al.  Meiotic recombination hot spots and cold spots , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[44]  P. Lio’,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[45]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[46]  P. Deloukas,et al.  Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps , 2001, Nature.

[47]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[48]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[49]  M. Nachman,et al.  Microsatellite variation and recombination rate in the human genome. , 2000, Genetics.

[50]  J. Mickelson,et al.  First comprehensive low-density horse linkage map based on two 3-generation, full-sibling, cross-bred horse reference families. , 2000, Genomics.

[51]  E. Remmers,et al.  An integrated genetic linkage map with 1,137 markers constructed from five F2 crosses of autoimmune disease-prone and -resistant inbred rat strains. , 2000, Genomics.

[52]  R G Steen,et al.  A high-density integrated genetic linkage and radiation hybrid map of the laboratory rat. , 1999, Genome research.

[53]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.

[54]  J C Murray,et al.  Pediatrics and , 1998 .

[55]  C. Aquadro Insights into the evolutionary process from patterns of DNA sequence variability. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[56]  C. Ebeling,et al.  Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[57]  R. Redfield,et al.  The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Gregory D Schuler,et al.  Sequence mapping by electronic PCR , 1997, Genome research.

[59]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome , 1996, Nature.

[60]  G. Churchill,et al.  Heterogeneity in rates of recombination across the mouse genome. , 1996, Genetics.

[61]  J. True,et al.  Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.

[62]  M. Qumsiyeh Evolution of number and morphology of mammalian chromosomes. , 1994, The Journal of heredity.

[63]  N. Goldman,et al.  Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[64]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[65]  G. Bernardi,et al.  The vertebrate genome: isochores and evolution. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[66]  C. Aquadro,et al.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster , 1992, Nature.

[67]  J. Gearhart,et al.  Sex, strain, and species differences affect recombination across an evolutionarily conserved segment of mouse chromosome 16. , 1990, Genomics.

[68]  S. Tavaré Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences , 1986 .

[69]  Y. Kodama,et al.  Characterization of silver-stained nucleolus organizer regions (Ag-NORs) in 16 inbred strains of the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus. , 1986, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[70]  G. Levan Nomenclature for G-bands in rat chromosomes. , 2009, Hereditas.

[71]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[72]  W. G. Hill,et al.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. , 1966, Genetical research.