Study on the Shielding Effect of Claddings with Transmitter–Receiver Sensor in Pulsed Eddy Current Testing

The shielding effect caused by the cladding has a serious influence on pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) of ferromagnetic metallic structures. To analyze the shielding effect and reveal the essence for reducing the shielding effect, a non-coaxial transmitter–receiver sensor (TR sensor) is used, and the influence of the shielding effect caused by the cladding on the TR sensor is studied theoretically in this paper. Firstly, an analytical model for the TR sensor with rectangular cross-section coils is conducted by using the first integral mean value theorem. Then, on the basis of the analytical model, the expression of the shielding effectiveness is derived to quantitatively evaluate the shielding effect and the spatial frequency spectra is utilized to research the characteristics of the sensor. Based on these, the performances of the TR sensor for reducing the shielding effect are studied. Results show the TR sensor which is more sensitive to the smaller radial spatial frequency can be used to reduce the shielding effect caused by the galvanized steel sheet.

[1]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Pulsed eddy current thickness measurement using phase features immune to liftoff effect , 2017 .

[2]  Shejuan Xie,et al.  Quantitative non-destructive evaluation of wall thinning defect in double-layer pipe of nuclear power plants using pulsed ECT method , 2015 .

[3]  Anders Rosell,et al.  Efficient finite element modelling of eddy current probability of detection with transmitter–receiver sensors , 2015 .

[4]  Shang Gao,et al.  Analytical modelling of eddy current response from driver pick-up coils on multi-layered conducting plates , 2018 .

[5]  Theodoros Theodoulidis,et al.  Series expansions in eddy current nondestructive evaluation models , 2005 .

[6]  Noritaka Yusa,et al.  Some advances in numerical analysis techniques for quantitative electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation , 2009 .

[7]  Richard Binns,et al.  Analysis of the Liftoff Effect of Phase Spectra for Eddy Current Sensors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Weiying Cheng,et al.  Pulsed Eddy Current Testing of Carbon Steel Pipes’ Wall-thinning Through Insulation and Cladding , 2012 .

[9]  W. Chew Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media , 1990 .

[10]  V. G. Rybachuk,et al.  Signals from an attachable anaxial-type eddy-current transducer positioned above a conducting half-space , 2014, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing.

[11]  Dibo Hou,et al.  Analytical modeling for transient probe response in pulsed eddy current testing , 2009 .

[13]  G. Mook,et al.  Deep Penetrating Eddy Currents and Probes , 2007 .

[14]  Toshiyuki Takagi,et al.  Inverse Methodology for Eddy Current Testing Using Transmitter‐Receiver Coil Probes , 2004 .

[15]  V. O. de Haan,et al.  Analytical expressions for transient induction voltage in a receiving coil due to a coaxial transmitting coil over a conducting plate , 2004 .

[16]  C. Paul Introduction to electromagnetic compatibility , 2005 .

[17]  C. Dodd,et al.  ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS TO EDDY--CURRENT PROBE COIL PROBLEMS. , 1968 .

[18]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Sizing of Wall Thinning Defects Using Pulsed Eddy Current Testing Signals Based on a Hybrid Inverse Analysis Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[19]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Fast analytical modelling for pulsed eddy current evaluation , 2008 .