Seismic fragility assessment framework for highway bridges based on an improved uniform design-response surface model methodology

This paper proposes an improved uniform design (UD)-response surface model (RSM) method to reduce the impacts of sample correlation among small sample data caused by UD method and variable substitution process in the traditional UD-RSM method. The proposed B-spline-PLS-UD-RSM method, which is a systematic approach that combines nonlinear B-spline functions, the conventional UD-RSM method and the partial least-squares (PLS) regression technique, assesses the reliability of structures with high nonlinearity and multi-dimensionality. First, two reliability examples from the literature are investigated to demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed RSM method. Subsequently, to investigate the applicability of the proposed method in seismic fragility analyses considering various parameter uncertainties and variable correlation, an alternative seismic fragility assessment framework is developed for highway bridges. Furthermore, this paper uses a typical multi-span reinforced concrete continuous girder (MSRCCG) bridge as a case study and performs a comparative analysis of the corresponding seismic fragility evaluations at both bridge component and system levels by using traditional and improved RSM methods. The results indicate the following conclusions: (1) The proposed B-spline-PLS-UD-RSM method can properly reduce the effect of sample correlation and achieve satisfactory reliability results for structures with highly nonlinear and multi-dimensional features through a much smaller sample size; (2) The proposed seismic fragility assessment framework is a good candidate for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges incorporating variable correlation of structural parameters; (3) Seismic fragilities of bridge structures tend to be overestimated by using traditional UD-RSM methods and by ignoring the variable correlation of structural random parameters.

[1]  K Ang,et al.  A NOTE ON UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN , 1981 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty , 2010 .

[3]  Lifeng Li,et al.  Seismic Assessment of Medium-Span Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridges Using the Component and System Fragility Functions , 2016 .

[4]  Michel Ghosn,et al.  Seismic Fragility of Retrofitted Multispan Continuous Steel Bridges in New York , 2012 .

[5]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[6]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Probabilistic Demand Models and Fragility Curves for Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2006 .

[7]  Xibing Li,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network , 2005 .

[8]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[9]  A Henriques,et al.  An innovative adaptive sparse response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2018, Structural Safety.

[10]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Analytical Seismic Fragility Curves for Typical Bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States , 2007 .

[11]  R. Lebrun,et al.  An innovating analysis of the Nataf transformation from the copula viewpoint , 2009 .

[12]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[13]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices , 2008 .

[14]  B. G. Nielson Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[15]  Wei Wang,et al.  Non-linear partial least squares response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios , 2008 .

[17]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures , 2008 .

[18]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY UNDER INCOMPLETE PROBABILITY INFORMATION , 1986 .

[19]  Lifeng Li,et al.  Seismic fragility assessment of a multi-span cable-stayed bridge with tall piers , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[21]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .

[22]  Michel Ghosn,et al.  Seismic Fragility of Continuous Steel Highway Bridges in New York State , 2007 .

[23]  Wancheng Yuan,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Different Sources of Uncertainties , 2014 .

[24]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Probabilistic Push-Over Analysis of Structural and Soil-Structure Systems , 2010 .

[25]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Response Surface―Based Finite-Element-Model Updating Using Structural Static Responses , 2011 .

[26]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[27]  Sven Apel,et al.  Faster Discovery of Faster System Configurations with Spectral Learning , 2017 .

[28]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Analysis of approximations for multinormal integration in system reliability computation , 2006 .

[29]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  An effective approximation to evaluate multinormal integrals , 1998 .

[30]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment of Simply Supported and Continuous Multispan Concrete Girder Highway Bridges , 2007 .

[31]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for California Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[32]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation , 2001 .

[33]  P. Bjerager Probability Integration by Directional Simulation , 1988 .