Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs

Large numbers of students depart from engineering programs before graduation. For example, in fields such as engineering and computer science, students have commented on the inaccessible or unapproachable nature of faculty. To evaluate this problem, this study gathered data across four research universities. Using structural equation modeling, it measured environmental effects, i.e., academic integration or faculty distance on (a) self-efficacy, (b) academic confidence and (c) self-regulated learning behaviors effort, critical thinking, help-seeking and peer learning, and (d) GPA. Results showed that faculty distance lowered self-efficacy, academic confidence and GPA. Conversely, academic integration had a positive effect on self-efficacy, which in turn had strong positive effects on effort and critical thinking. Consequently, ongoing educational reform efforts must encourage engineering faculty to understand the significance of their student/professor relationships and seriously undertake measures to become personally available to students.

[1]  J. P. Byrnes,et al.  Retention and Performance of Male and Female Engineering Students: An Examination of Academic and Environmental Variables , 1998 .

[2]  Catherine P. Serex.  Perceptions of Classroom Climate by Students in Non-Traditional Majors for Their Gender. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. , 1997 .

[3]  B. French,et al.  An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence , 2005 .

[4]  John M. Seiner,et al.  Understanding the Role of Self‐Efficacy in Engineering Education , 2001 .

[5]  Vincent Tinto.  Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research , 1975 .

[6]  Linda Serra Hagedorn,et al.  A Social Cognitive Construct Validation: Determining Women's and Men's Success in Engineering Programs , 2007 .

[7]  B. Zimmerman.  A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[8]  C. Wolters.  Self-Regulated Learning and College Students' Regulation of Motivation. , 1998 .

[9]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account , 1995 .

[10]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success , 2002 .

[11]  John P. Bean.  Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition , 1980 .

[12]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[13]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Perceived teacher support of student questioning in the college classroom: Its relation to student characteristics and role in the classroom questioning process. , 1994 .

[14]  R. Butler.  Determinants of help seeking : Relations between perceived reasons for classroom help-avoidance and help-seeking behaviors in an experimental context , 1998 .

[15]  Amaury Nora,et al.  The Convergence between Two Theories of College Persistence , 1990 .

[16]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[17]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research , 1999 .

[18]  A. Santiago,et al.  BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS AS PREDICTORS OF ACADEMIC SELF-CONFIDENCE AND ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY AMONG GRADUATE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 1996 .

[19]  P. Pintrich,et al.  "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. , 1997 .