Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams

In this study the relationship between teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams was explored. A comparative case study was conducted in five temporary teams in secondary schools. Several quantitative and qualitative data collection methods were used to examine collaboration, teacher learning, and the context for learning and collaboration. In cross‐site analysis two complementary patterns of teacher learning and collaboration were identified. Collaboration in all teams could be characterized as ‘sharing’. However, sharing was further specified with regard to differences in the content and aims of sharing. Different types of sharing were related to teacher learning. The results give cause to rethink the nature of interdependence in collaboration, and the nature of the relationship between collaboration and learning. A practical result may be that collaboration in innovative, temporary, and voluntary teams could be a promising direction for teacher professional development.

[1]  S. J. Rosenholtz.  Teacher's workplace : the social organization of schools , 1991 .

[2]  Margaret C. Lohman.  A survey of factors influencing the engagement of two professional groups in informal workplace learning activities , 2005 .

[3]  F. Oser,et al.  Competence oriented teacher training : old research demands and new pathways , 2006 .

[4]  S. Bolhuis,et al.  Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: what do teachers do? , 2001 .

[5]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  The Relationships between Teachers' General Beliefs about Teaching and Learning and Their Domain Specific Curricular Beliefs. , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  International handbook of teachers and teaching , 1997 .

[7]  D. Butler,et al.  Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development , 2004 .

[8]  J. Galassi,et al.  Variables Affecting Collaborative Research and Learning in a Professional Development School Partnership , 2003, The Journal of Educational Research.

[9]  H. Tillema,et al.  Knowledge construction in collaborative enquiry among teachers 1 , 2006 .

[10]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing teachers for a changing world , 2005 .

[11]  Paulien C. Meijer,et al.  A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings , 2007 .

[12]  K. Weick,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed. , 1980 .

[13]  P. Sleegers,et al.  The Tension Between Organisational Sub-structures in Secondary Schools and Educational Reform , 2001 .

[14]  C.H.E. Kwakman,et al.  Leren van docenten tijdens de beroepsloopbaan: studies naar professionaliteit op de werkplek in het voortgezet onderwijs , 1999 .

[15]  Jeroen Imants,et al.  Departments as Teams: Functioning, variations and alternatives , 1999 .

[16]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Teacher Learning: Implications of New Views of Cognition , 1997 .

[17]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Organizational Collaboration. , 1986 .

[18]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[19]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Curriculum Control and Teachers' Perceptions of Autonomy and Satisfaction , 1994 .

[20]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[21]  J. Imants,et al.  Practice‐based research on the development of activating instruction and self‐directed student learning: Dutch writing instruction , 2011 .

[22]  Thomas G. Dunn,et al.  Deliberate practice in teaching: what teachers do for self-improvement , 1999 .

[23]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[25]  David Hopkins,et al.  International Handbook of Educational Change , 2007 .

[26]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[27]  N. J. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion , 1980 .

[28]  Paulien C. Meijer,et al.  Understanding Teacher Learning in Secondary Education: The Relations of Teacher Activities to Changed Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. , 2009 .

[29]  M. Voeten,et al.  Teachers' conceptions of student learning and own learning , 2004 .

[30]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Writing and Learning to Write: A Double Challenge , 2000 .

[31]  Jana Chocholatá.  How Teachers Learn and Develop , 2011 .

[32]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[33]  J. Imants.  Two basic mechanisms for organisational learning in schools , 2003 .

[34]  J. V. D. Linden,et al.  New Learning: Three Ways to Learn in a New Balance , 2000 .

[35]  Malcolm Skilbeck,et al.  School Based Curriculum Development , 1984 .

[36]  Donald C. Pennington,et al.  The social psychology of behaviour in small groups , 2002 .

[37]  Bruce Johnson,et al.  Teacher collaboration: good for some, not so good for others , 2003 .

[38]  D. Pounder,et al.  Interdisciplinary Teacher Teams: Context, Design, and Process , 2000 .

[39]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[40]  Alan S. Marcus,et al.  How the Structure and Focus of Teachers' Collaborative Activities Facilitate and Constrain Teacher Learning. , 2010 .

[41]  Nancy J. Evans,et al.  The Group Attitude Scale , 1986 .