Negation in discourse: a text world approach to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22

This article presents a discourse-based approach to negation by applying text world theory to the analysis of negation in the novel Catch-22, by Joseph Heller (1986 [1961]), The model developed for the analysis of negation is based on Werth’s (1999) notion of negation as a subworld which modifies information which is present in the common ground of the discourse. By so doing, negation contributes to the general discourse function of updating information in the text world. Additionally, negation may form part of contradictory structures which, being self-contained units, do not contribute to the updating discourse function but, rather, seem to block the flow of information. The analysis of the functions of negation is framed within a broader framework of stylistic analysis, where the objective is to discuss how the foregrounded nature of negation as a recursive feature in Catch-22 may have a defamiliarizing effect. The argument put forward in this article is that negation plays a crucial role in the expression of a conflict between what is presented as real and what is presented as not real in the fictional world; this conflict, in its turn, has important consequences for the way the story develops and the way major themes of the novel are treated.

[1]  Katarzyna Marciniak,et al.  POSTMODERNIST FICTION , 2000 .

[2]  Han Xi-w.  Negation in English , 2000 .

[3]  Paul Werth,et al.  Text worlds : representing conceptual space in discourse , 1999 .

[4]  Michael P. Jordan,et al.  The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance , 1998 .

[5]  Seizi Iwata.  Some extensions of the echoic analysis of metalinguistic negation , 1998 .

[6]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Metalinguistic negation and echoic use , 1996 .

[7]  THE BROADER PERSPECTIVE OF NEGATION , 1994 .

[8]  G. Tottie.  Negation in English speech and writing : a study in variation , 1993 .

[9]  Angela Downing,et al.  A University Course in English Grammar , 1992 .

[10]  Marie-Laure Ryan.  Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory , 1992 .

[11]  M. V. E. Vidal.  Estrategias en la interpretación de enunciados contradictorios , 1990 .

[12]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[13]  T. Givon.  Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics , 1989 .

[14]  Laurence R. Horn.  Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity , 1985 .

[15]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[16]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Frames and the semantics of understanding , 1985 .

[17]  R. Huddleston.  Introduction to the Grammar of English: Verbs, nouns and adjectives: the boundaries between them , 1984 .

[18]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[19]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[20]  J. Atlas,et al.  It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version) , 1981 .

[21]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics , 1979 .

[22]  Lars-Gunnar Andersson,et al.  Logic in linguistics , 1982 .

[23]  Ruth Kempson,et al.  Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics , 1975 .

[24]  M. Dummett.  Frege: Philosophy of Language , 1973 .

[25]  P. Wason.  The contexts of plausible denial , 1965 .