Clarifying matters of (meta-) modeling: an author’s reply

In his article “More Matters on (Meta-)Modelling— Remarks on Thomas Kuhne’s ‘matters’ ” [2] Wolfgang Hesse addresses some of the issues I have raised in my article “Matters of (Meta-) Modeling” [1] and I very much welcome his idea of stirring up a constructive debate about some important fundamentals of modeling. In this response I follow up the discussion started by [2] by focusing on areas of disagreement, in particular pointing out where my statements in [1] have been interpreted in a way I did not intend. Ideally, the following clarifications will thus aid the understanding of the issues I have originally addressed in [1] and continue the constructive debate started in [2].

[1]  Colin Atkinson,et al.  Profiles in a strict metamodeling framework , 2002, Sci. Comput. Program..

[2]  Thomas Kühne,et al.  Matters of (Meta-) Modeling , 2006, Software & Systems Modeling.

[3]  Colin Atkinson,et al.  Concepts for comparing modeling tool architectures , 2005, MoDELS'05.

[4]  Wolfgang Hesse,et al.  More matters on (meta-)modelling: remarks on Thomas Kühne’s “matters” , 2006, Software & Systems Modeling.

[5]  Colin Atkinson,et al.  Processes and Products in a Multi-Level Metamodeling Architecture , 2001, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..