Fast Genes and Slow Clades: Comparative Rates of Molecular Evolution in Mammals

Although interest in the rate of molecular evolution and the molecular clock remains high, our knowledge for most groups in these areas is derived largely from a patchwork of studies limited in both their taxon coverage and the number of genes examined. Using a comprehensive molecular data set of 44 genes (18 nDNA, 11 tRNA and 15 additional mtDNA genes) together with a virtually complete and dated phylogeny of extant mammals, I 1) describe differences in the rate of molecular evolution (i.e. substitution rate) within this group in an explicit phylogenetic and quantitative framework and 2) present the first attempt to localize the phylogenetic positions of any rate shifts. Significant rate differences were few and confirmed several long-held trends, including a progressive rate slowdown within hominids and a reduced substitution rate within Cetacea. However, many new patterns were also uncovered, including the mammalian orders being characterized generally by basal rate slowdowns. A link between substitution rate and the size of a clade (which derives from its net speciation rate) is also suggested, with the species-poor major clades (“orders”) showing more decreased rates that often extend throughout the entire clade. Significant rate increases were rare, with the rates within (murid) rodents being fast, but not significantly so with respect to other mammals as a whole. Despite clear lineage-specific differences, rates generally change gradually along these lineages, supporting the potential existence of a local molecular clock in mammals. Together, these results will lay the foundation for a broad-scale analysis to establish the correlates and causes of the rate of molecular evolution in mammals.

[1]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[2]  A. Rambaut,et al.  Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[3]  S. Renner Relaxed molecular clocks for dating historical plant dispersal events. , 2005, Trends in plant science.

[4]  James H. Brown,et al.  The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Fitch,et al.  Correcting parsimonious trees for unseen nucleotide substitutions: the effect of dense branching as exemplified by ribonuclease. , 1990, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  O. Bininda-Emonds Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information To Reveal The Tree Of Life , 2004 .

[7]  D. Penny,et al.  The modern molecular clock , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Partitioning the variation in mammalian substitution rates. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Mutation rate variation in the mammalian genome. , 2003, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[10]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences , 2007, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[11]  W. Li,et al.  Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Britten,et al.  Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. , 1986, Science.

[13]  R. Adkins,et al.  Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[14]  Sue Povey,et al.  Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  Andrew Meade,et al.  Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[17]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[18]  M. Pagel,et al.  Large Punctuational Contribution of Speciation to Evolutionary Divergence at the Molecular Level , 2006, Science.

[19]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[20]  S. Ho,et al.  Molecular clocks: when times are a-changin'. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  L. Pauling,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .

[22]  D M Irwin,et al.  Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. , 1991, Journal of molecular evolution.

[23]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  The delayed rise of present-day mammals , 1990, Nature.

[26]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  S. Easteal The relative rate of DNA evolution in primates. , 1991, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Mark Pagel,et al.  Molecular Phylogenies Link Rates of Evolution and Speciation , 2003, Science.

[29]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  N. M. Brooke,et al.  A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution , 1998, Nature.

[31]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Detecting Diversification Rate Variation in Supertrees , 2004 .

[32]  Lindell Bromham,et al.  Molecular dating when rates vary. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  R B Setlow,et al.  Correlation between deoxyribonucleic acid excision-repair and life-span in a number of mammalian species. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[35]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference , 1993 .