Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems

Actor-network theory (ANT) has achieved a measure of popularity in the analysis of information systems. This paper looks at ANT from the perspective of the social realism of Margaret Archer. It argues that the main issue with ANT from a realist perspective is its adoption of a `flat' ontology, particularly with regard to human beings. It explores the value of incorporating concepts from ANT into a social realist approach, but argues that the latter offers a more productive way of approaching information systems.

[1]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Power, Machines and Social Relations: Delegating to Information Technology in the National Health Service , 1995 .

[2]  J. Searle.  THE MYSTERY OF CONSCIOUSNESS , 2019, Intellectual Entertainments.

[3]  Peter Miller,et al.  The multiplying machine , 1997 .

[4]  Steven Yearley,et al.  Journey into space , 1992 .

[5]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science , 1999 .

[6]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[8]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[9]  A. Callinicos.  Social Theory: A Historical Introduction , 1999 .

[10]  Oscar Wilde.  The Importance of Being Earnest and Other Plays , 1895 .

[11]  Robert Willmott,et al.  The Place of Culture in Organization Theory: Introducing the Morphogenetic Approach , 2000 .

[12]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[13]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[14]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[15]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[16]  A. Callinicos.  Anthony Giddens , 1985 .

[17]  Richard Flacks,et al.  Making history: An introduction to the history and practices of a discipline: an introduction to the practices of history , 2004 .

[18]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[19]  Exploring Socio-Technical Analysis: Monsieur Latour is not Joking! , 1992 .

[20]  Margaret S. Archer.  Culture And Agency: Contents , 1996 .

[21]  Steve Fuller,et al.  Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies , 1993 .

[22]  Flann O'Brien,et al.  The Third Policeman , 1967 .

[23]  M. Reed,et al.  In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis , 1997 .

[24]  Alistair Mutch.  Managers, information and teams: a tale of two companies , 2000 .

[25]  Hilary Rose,et al.  Love, power, and knowledge : towards a feminist transformation of the sciences , 1994 .

[26]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[27]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[28]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Paper traces: inscribing organisation and information technology , 1997 .

[29]  P. Baumard.  Tacit Knowledge in Organizations , 1999 .

[30]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind , 1992 .

[31]  W. Outhwaite.  New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory , 1991 .

[32]  S. Rose.  The Making Of Memory , 1992 .

[33]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[34]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[35]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[36]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[37]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[38]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives , 1994 .

[39]  S. Rose,et al.  The Making of Memory: From Molecules to Mind , 1996 .

[40]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  What the Social Text affair does and does not prove , 1998 .

[41]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[42]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[43]  O. Amsterdamska.  Book Review : Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!Science in Action, by Bruno Latour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press: 1987, 274 pp. $25.00. Also available in paper from Harvard University Press, $12.95 , 1990 .

[44]  Margaret S. Archer.  Theory, Culture and Post-Industrial Society , 1990 .

[45]  E. Laurier,et al.  X-Morphising: Review Essay of Bruno Latour's Aramis, or the Love of Technology , 1999 .

[46]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realist social theory: The morphogenetic cycle , 1997 .

[47]  Bridget Fowler.  Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations , 1997 .

[48]  Pauline Harris,et al.  The Emergent Manager , 1999 .

[49]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach , 1984 .

[50]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[51]  J. Law.  After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[52]  Richard H. Roberts,et al.  The Recovery of rhetoric : persuasive discourse and disciplinarity in the human sciences , 1994 .

[53]  W. Outhwaite,et al.  New philosophies of social science , 1987 .

[54]  M. Archer.  Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory , 1996 .

[55]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[56]  Steven Shapin,et al.  Following Scientists Around , 1988 .