Description of the weathering states of building stones by fractal geometry and fuzzy inference system in the Olba ancient city (Southern Turkey)

Applying an engineering geology research to historical places under conservation is very difficult because of sampling restrictions. In order to overcome this difficulty, some non-destructive methods have been used to assess the weathering degrees of the building stones. For this purpose, intensive field studies including the Schmidt hammer test, development and application of a simple visual classification and photograph shootings for fractal geometry have been carried out. A total of 114 blocks were employed during the field studies. With increasing the weathering, the Schmidt hammer values and the fractal dimensions of the blocks systematically decrease. In the final stage of the study, a fuzzy inference system to quantify the weathering degree of the building stones have been constructed. The performance of the inference system is assessed by various methods and the results show that this fuzzy inference system produces plausible results and has a higher prediction capacity. Combination of the various employed methods provides a non-destructive and a simple methodology for the description of the weathering states of the building stones. In this study, the advantages of fractal geometry are considered because its main advantage is to analyze the scale invariance. However, to provide a second check on the weathering descriptions of the blocks, the Schmidt harness is utilized. The approach can be applied on the determination of weathering states of building stones and blocky rock masses.

[1]  C. L. Karr,et al.  Fuzzy control of pH using genetic algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Ebrahim H. Mamdani,et al.  An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  B. Mandelbrot How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension , 1967, Science.

[5]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  Angular fuzzy set models for linguistic values , 1990 .

[6]  J. Thieme,et al.  Fractal characterization of hematite aggregates by X-ray microscopy , 1996 .

[7]  P. Kulatilake,et al.  Box fractal dimension as a measure of statistical homogeneity of jointed rock masses , 1997 .

[8]  C. Gokceoğlu,et al.  New approaches to the characterization of clay-bearing, densely jointed and weak rock masses , 2000 .

[9]  E. Hamdi,et al.  A Fractal Description of Simulated 3D Discontinuity Networks , 2008 .

[10]  D. R. Gahrooee,et al.  Application of rock mass weakening coefficient for stability assessment of slopes in heavily jointed rock mass , 1989 .

[11]  K. Oleschko,et al.  Weathering: Toward a Fractal Quantifying , 2004 .

[12]  Mario Alvarez Grima,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy modeling in engineering geology , 2000 .

[13]  Y. L. Gulbin,et al.  Morphometry of Quartz Aggregates in Granites: Fractal Images Referring to Nucleation and Growth Processes , 2003 .

[14]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[15]  A. Navarre‐Sitchler,et al.  Basalt weathering across scales , 2007 .

[16]  Allen W. Hatheway,et al.  The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring; 1974–2006 , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas G. Blenkinsop,et al.  Fractal Characterization of Particle Size Distributions in Chromitites from the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe , 2000 .

[18]  J. Bernal,et al.  Fractal geometry and mercury porosimetry: Comparison and application of proposed models on building stones , 2001 .

[19]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  Indirect determination of weighted joint density (wJd) by empirical and fuzzy models: Supren (Eskisehir, Turkey) marbles , 2006 .

[20]  L. Vallejo,et al.  Fractal analysis of the roughness and size distribution of granular materials , 1997 .

[21]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Juan Luis Pérez Bernal,et al.  The fractal dimension of stone pore surface as weathering descriptor , 2000 .

[23]  D. G. Price,et al.  Weathering and weathering processes , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[24]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  A Mamdani Model to Predict the Weighted Joint Density , 2003, KES.

[25]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A rationale for fuzzy control , 1972 .

[26]  Judy Ehlen,et al.  Fracture characteristics in weathered granites , 1999 .

[27]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  A Mamdani fuzzy inference system for the geological strength index (GSI) and its use in slope stability assessments , 2004 .

[28]  H. Hellendoorn,et al.  Defuzzification in Fuzzy Controllers , 1993, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[29]  A. Jones 10 – Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering , 1989 .

[30]  G. Pardini,et al.  Fractal scaling of surface roughness in artificially weathered smectite-rich soil regoliths , 2003 .

[31]  Kamil Kayabali,et al.  Investigation of the effect of aggregate shape and surface roughness on the slake durability index using the fractal dimension approach , 2006 .

[32]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  An application of fuzzy sets to the Geological Strength Index (GSI) system used in rock engineering , 2003 .

[33]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of the Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition , 2002 .

[34]  Magne Setnes,et al.  Rule-based modeling: precision and transparency , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[35]  J. H. Kruhl,et al.  The fractal shape of sutured quartz grain boundaries: application as a geothermometer , 1996 .

[36]  A. K. Raina,et al.  Rock mass characterization by fractal dimension , 2002 .

[37]  Domenico Calcaterra,et al.  Building stone and related weathering in the architecture of the ancient city of Naples , 2000 .