The mh gene causing double-muscling in cattle maps to bovine Chromosome 2

While the hereditary nature of the “double-muscling” phenotype (a generalized muscular hypertrophy documented in several cattle breeds) is well established, its precise segregation mode has remained controversial. Both monogenic models (autosomal dominant or recessive) and oligogenic models have been proposed. Using a panel of 213 bovine microsatellite markers, and an experimental pedigree obtained by backcrossing “double-muscled (Belgian Blue)xconventional (Friesian)” F1 dams to double-muscled sire, we have mapped a locus on bovine Chromosome (Chr) 2 that accounts for all the phenotypic variance in the backcross generation. This locus, referred to as mh (muscular hypertrophy), has been positioned with respect to a map composed of seven Chr 2-specific microsatellites, at 2 cM from the closest marker. This result confirms the validity in the Belgian Blue population of the monogenic model involving an autosomal mh locus, characterized by a wild-type “+” and a recessive “mh” allele, causing the double-muscling phenotype in the homozygous condition. The linkage relationship between the mh locus and the Chr 2 markers was confirmed in three informative pedigrees collected from the general Belgian Blue Cattle population, reinforcing the notion of genetic homogeneity of the double-muscling trait in this breed. This work paves the way towards marker-assisted selection for or against the double-muscling trait, and towards positional cloning of the corresponding gene.

[1]  M. Georges,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. , 1995, Genetics.

[2]  M. Georges,et al.  A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[3]  J. Keele,et al.  A genetic linkage map for cattle. , 1994, Genetics.

[4]  Nancy A. Jenkins,et al.  Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[5]  T. C. Cartwright,et al.  Double Muscling in Cattle. , 1980 .

[6]  S. Swillens,et al.  On the use of DNA fingerprints for linkage studies in cattle. , 1990, Genomics.

[7]  C. Lengauer,et al.  Comparative genome map of human and cattle. , 1995, Genomics.

[8]  M. Georges,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production by exploiting progeny testing , 1995 .

[9]  C. Michaux,et al.  Relationships between growth rate, carcass composition, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and income in four biological types of cattle , 1987, Génétique, sélection, évolution.

[10]  F. Ménissier Present State of Knowledge About the Genetic Determination of Muscular Hypertrophy or the Double Muscled Trait in Cattle , 1982 .

[11]  C. Michaux,et al.  On the genetic determinism of muscular hypertrophy in the Belgian White and Blue cattle breed. II. Population data , 1985, Génétique, sélection, évolution.

[12]  C. Michaux,et al.  On the genetic determinism of muscular hypertrophy in the Belgian White and Blue cattle breed. I. Experimental data , 1985, Genetique, selection, evolution.

[13]  J. B. Owen,et al.  The major gene of muscular hypertrophy in the Belgian Blue cattle breed. , 1991 .

[14]  C. Dessy-Doizé,et al.  Studies on the 7th Rib Cut in Double Muscled and Conventional Cattle. Anatomical, Histological and Biochemical Aspects , 1982 .

[15]  G. Lathrop,et al.  Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. , 1984, American journal of human genetics.