p55 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Fusion Protein in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Objective. —To evaluate the safety and efficacy of p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein, a recombinant chimeric protein of human p55 (type I) tumor necrosis factor receptor (CD120a) extracellular domain and lgG1 sequences (referred to as p55-lgG), in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Design. —Randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting. —Forty-four community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States and Europe. patients. —There were 498 patients enrolled in this clinical trial. Intervention. —Patients prospectively stratified within each site into refractory shock or severe sepsis groups were randomized to receive a single infusion of p55IgG, 0.083 mg/kg, 0.042 mg/kg, or 0.008 mg/kg, or placebo. Patients received standard aggressive medical/surgical care during the 28-day postinfusion period. Outcome Measure. —Twenty-eight—day all-cause mortality. Results. —The distribution of variables describing demographics, organ system dysfunction or failure, infecting microorganisms, predicted mortality, plasma interleukin 6 levels, and plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) levels were similar among patients in the p55-lgG and placebo treatment arms. A planned interim analysis was performed after 201 patients were enrolled. Because a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality was present in patients who had received 0.008 mg/kg, this treatment arm was discontinued, and the study continued with 3 arms. Among all infused patients, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward reduced 28-day all-cause mortality in those who received p55-lgG compared with placebo-treated patients (5% reduction, 0.042 mg/kg vs placebo; 15% reduction, 0.083 mg/kg vs placebo;P=.30). However, in patients with severe sepsis and early septic shock (n=247), therapy with p55-lgG, 0.083 mg/kg, was associated with a 36% reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality compared with placebo (P=.07): 20 (23%) of 87 patients died among those treated with p55-lgG, 0.083 mg/kg; 30 (37%) of 82 among those treated with p55-lgG, 0.042 mg/kg; and 28 (36%) of 78 in the placebo group. A prospectively planned logistic regression analysis to assess treatment effect on 28-day all-cause mortality by means of predicted mortality and serum interleukin 6 levels as continuous covariates demonstrated a significant improvement in outcome for the patients with severe sepsis treated with p55-lgG, 0.083 mg/kg, compared with placebo (P=.01). Serious adverse events, including death and the development of new organ system dysfunction, were reported in 65% of patients infused with placebo, with no increased frequency (56%) present in the 2 p55-lgG treatment arms. There were no reports of immediate hypersensitivity reactions caused by p55-lgG. Conclusions. —In this dose-finding study, there was no decrease in mortality between placebo and p55-lgG in all infused patients. In the prospectively defined population of patients with severe sepsis who received p55-lgG, 0.083 mg/kg, there was a trend toward reduced mortality at day 28 that became significant when predicted mortality and plasma interleukin 6 levels were included in a logistic regression analysis.

[1]  J. Carlet,et al.  INTERSEPT: an international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of monoclonal antibody to human tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients with sepsis. International Sepsis Trial Study Group. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[2]  S. Opal,et al.  Treatment of septic shock with the tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein. The Soluble TNF Receptor Sepsis Study Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Willatts,et al.  Assessment of the safety and efficacy of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody-fragment, MAK 195F, in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[4]  S. Calvano,et al.  Protection against lethal Escherichia coli bacteremia in baboons (Papio anubis) by pretreatment with a 55-kDa TNF receptor (CD120a)-Ig fusion protein, Ro 45-2081. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[5]  S. Banks,et al.  Effects of recombinant dimeric TNF receptor on human inflammatory responses following intravenous endotoxin administration. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[6]  G. Ramsay,et al.  Natural cytokine antagonists and endogenous antiendotoxin core antibodies in sepsis syndrome. The Sepsis Intervention Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  G. Koch,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibody to Human Tumor Necrosis Factor α in Patients With Sepsis Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1995 .

[8]  H. Loetscher,et al.  Protective effect of 55- but not 75-kD soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-immunoglobulin G fusion proteins in an animal model of gram- negative sepsis , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  R. Bone,et al.  Plasma Cytokine and Endotoxin Levels Correlate with Survival in Patients with the Sepsis Syndrome , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  C J Fisher,et al.  The clinical evaluation of new drugs for sepsis. A prospective study design based on survival analysis. , 1993, JAMA.

[11]  J. Singer,et al.  A simple multiple system organ failure scoring system predicts mortality of patients who have sepsis syndrome. , 1993, Chest.

[12]  A. Chang,et al.  Lethal Staphylococcus aureus-induced shock in primates: prevention of death with anti-TNF antibody. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  R. Wenzel Anti-endotoxin monoclonal antibodies--a second look. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. Aggarwal,et al.  Inhibition of ligand binding and antiproliferative effects of tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin by soluble forms of recombinant P60 and P80 receptors. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  D. Goeddel,et al.  Protection against endotoxic shock by a tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  B. Beutler,et al.  A tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-IgG heavy chain chimeric protein as a bivalent antagonist of TNF activity , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  H. Tabuchi,et al.  Recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor proteins protect mice from lipopolysaccharide‐induced lethality , 1991, European journal of immunology.

[18]  J. Parrillo Management of septic shock: present and future. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  C. Sprung,et al.  Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group. , 1991 .

[20]  F. Ognibene,et al.  Septic shock in humans. Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dysfunction, and therapy. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  T. van der Poll,et al.  Activation of coagulation after administration of tumor necrosis factor to normal subjects. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Opal,et al.  Efficacy of a monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor in protecting neutropenic rats from lethal infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[23]  A. Chang,et al.  Survival of primates in LD100 septic shock following therapy with antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF alpha). , 1990, Circulatory shock.

[24]  E. A. Havell Evidence that tumor necrosis factor has an important role in antibacterial resistance. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[25]  K. Tracey,et al.  Antibodies to cachectin/tumor necrosis factor reduce interleukin 1 beta and interleukin 6 appearance during lethal bacteremia , 1989, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  T. Clemmer,et al.  Sepsis syndrome: a valid clinical entity , 1989 .

[27]  A. Cerami,et al.  Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Kevin J. Tracey,et al.  Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia , 1987, Nature.

[29]  D. Newell,et al.  In pursuit of evidence based integrated care , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  T. Clemmer,et al.  A controlled clinical trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  D Greenwood,et al.  An analysis of community and hospital-acquired bacteraemia in a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. , 1987, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[32]  L. Jl Gram-negative sepsis. , 1976, Delaware medical journal.

[33]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Circulating interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor in septic shock and experimental endotoxin fever. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.