Introduction: Bedside teaching is the cornerstone of clinical teaching for the health professions. Different strategies have emerged to make it more effective. Many of the environments and opportunities available for bedside teaching and learning have changed. Methodology: This was a descriptive type of cross sectional study conducted in seven (three public and four private) medical colleges in Bangladesh over a period from July 2012 to June 2013 to determine the ways of conduction of bedside teaching in undergraduate medical education of Bangladesh. Total 30 Bedside teaching (BST) sessions conducted in the ward in Obstetrics and Gynaecology departments were observed by researcher herself and data was collected in a structured check list by using 5 points rubric (1-lowest quality, 5-highest quality). The checklist had four main sections- physical environment of bedside sessions, issues regarding patient's comfort and attitude towards patient, teaching tasks and group dynamics. Each section had a number of items and total 27 items were observed. For each variable frequency distribution, mean score and standard deviation (SD) were calculated.Here mean score 5- no need of further improvement, as it covered all the required criteria, 4- very minimum effort, 3- some effort, 2= moderate effort, 1= considerable efforts are needed to fulfill the required criteria. Result: Among physical environment factors the mean score of temperature, noise, space, teacher-student ratio were >2 but 3 but 1 but 2 but 1 but 2 but 3 but 1 but 2 but 3 but <4. Conclusion: In all aspects of bed side teaching minimum to considerable efforts are necessary to make it more effective. A bedside teacher must know the importance of comfortable physical environment in learning and must learn how to involve patients and learners in the educational process, so faculty development is essential. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Education Vol.4(1) 2013: 2-7
[1]
I. Khan,et al.
Clinical teaching in Dermatology of Undergraduate Medical Students of Bangladesh
,
2012
.
[2]
P. McInerney,et al.
The evaluation of bedside teaching - an instrument for staff evaluation and student experience: A pilot study at a South African University
,
2010
.
[3]
H. Heussler,et al.
Effective teaching and learning on the wards: easier said than done?
,
2009,
Medical education.
[4]
B. Reilly,et al.
Inconvenient truths about effective clinical teaching
,
2007,
The Lancet.
[5]
Yvonne Steinert,et al.
Staff development for clinical teachers
,
2005
.
[6]
E. Chipp,et al.
The Clinical TeacherClinical placements for medical students: factors affecting patients’ involvement in medical education
,
2004,
Medical teacher.
[7]
S. Ramani,et al.
Whither Bedside Teaching? A Focus‐group Study of Clinical Teachers
,
2003,
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[8]
S. Ramani.
Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching
,
2003,
Medical teacher.
[9]
Y Lin,et al.
Understanding the clinical dilemmas that shape medical students' ethical development: questionnaire survey and focus group study
,
2001,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[10]
M J Hensley,et al.
Impediments to bed‐side teaching
,
1998,
Medical education.
[11]
M. Hensley,et al.
Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching
,
1997,
Medical education.
[12]
D. Roter,et al.
The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care.
,
1997,
The New England journal of medicine.
[13]
M. Lacombe.
On Bedside Teaching
,
1997,
Annals of Internal Medicine.
[14]
R. Harden,et al.
Clinical teaching strategies for physicians.
,
1985,
Medical teacher.