Talking About Information Literacy: The Mediating Role of Discourse in a College Writing Classroom

This paper reports on the findings of an observational study of information literacy instruction in a college writing course. Using a sociocultural approach, the study explores how classroom discourse can influence the ways in which students conceive of information literacy and the process of research and writing. We found that a discourse that emphasized “finding sources” more than “learning about” might limit students’ engagement with information and the process of inquiry. This article concludes with recommendations for modifying discourse and instructional practices in order to help students engage more deeply in the research process.

[1]  Arthur Winzenried,et al.  Practising Information Literacy: Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together , 2011 .

[2]  Jennifer E. Phyllis Mentzell Nutefall,et al.  The Timing of the Research Question: First-Year Writing Faculty and Instruction Librarians' Differing Perspectives , 2010 .

[3]  Lasse Lipponen.  Chapter 3 – Information literacy as situated and distributed activity , 2010 .

[4]  Alison J. Head,et al.  Lessons Learned: How College Students Seek Information in the Digital Age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. , 2009 .

[5]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies , 2010 .

[6]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  Truth Be Told: How College Students Evaluate and Use Information in the Digital Age , 2010 .

[7]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Recasting information literacy as socio-cultural practice: implications for library and information science researchers , 2007, Inf. Res..

[8]  Barbara Fister.  Smoke and mirrors: Finding order in a chaotic world , 2005 .

[9]  Marx W. Wartofsky,et al.  Models: Representation And The Scientific Understanding , 1979 .

[10]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: From the Systemic to the Relational: Relational Agency and Activity Theory , 2009 .

[11]  Barbara Fister,et al.  The Research Processes of Undergraduate Students. , 1992 .

[12]  Rebecca Moore Howard,et al.  Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences , 2010 .

[13]  Louise Limberg,et al.  Teaching information seeking: relating information literacy education to theories of information behaviour , 2006, Inf. Res..

[14]  Mandy Lupton.  Evidence, argument and social responsibility: first‐year students’ experiences of information literacy when researching an essay , 2008 .

[15]  Gordon Wells,et al.  The Mediating Role of Discoursing in Activity , 2007 .

[16]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Framing information literacy as information practice: site ontology and practice theory , 2010, J. Documentation.

[17]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[18]  Olof Sundin,et al.  Pragmatism, neo-pragmatism and sociocultural theory: Communicative participation as a perspective in LIS , 2005, J. Documentation.

[19]  K. Tuominen,et al.  Information Literacy as a Sociotechnical Practice1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[20]  C. Pawley,et al.  Information Literacy: A Contradictory Coupling , 2003, The Library Quarterly.

[21]  Cushla Kapitzke.  INFORMATION LITERACY: A POSITIVIST EPISTEMOLOGY AND A POLITICS OF OUTFORMATION , 2003 .

[22]  Alison J. Head,et al.  Assigning Inquiry: How Handouts for Research Assignments Guide Today's College Students , 2010 .

[23]  Brenda Spatt.  Writing from sources , 1983 .

[24]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Towards an understanding of information literacy in context , 2008, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Louise Limberg.  Three conceptions of information seeking and use , 1999 .

[26]  James Elmborg.  Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice , 2006 .