Unbundling dynamic capabilities for inter-organizational collaboration

The purpose of this paper is to explore two distinct subsets of dynamic capabilities that need to be deployed when pursuing innovation through inter-organizational activities, respectively, in the contexts of broad networks and specific alliances. The authors draw distinctions and explore potential interdependencies between these two dynamic capability reservoirs, by integrating concepts from the theoretical perspectives they are derived from, but which have until now largely ignored each other – the social network perspective and the dynamic capabilities view.,The authors investigate nanotechnology-driven R&D activities in the 1995–2005 period for 76 publicly traded firms in the electronics and electrical equipment industry and in the chemicals and pharmaceuticals industry, that applied for 580 nanotechnology-related patents and engaged in 2,459 alliances during the observation period. The authors used zero-truncated Poisson regression as the estimation method.,The findings support conceptualizing dynamic capabilities as four distinct subsets, deployed for sensing or seizing purposes, and across the two different inter-organizational contexts. The findings also suggest potential synergies between these subsets of dynamic capabilities, with two subsets being more macro-oriented (i.e. sensing and seizing opportunities within networks) and the two other ones more micro-oriented (i.e. sensing and seizing opportunities within specific alliances).,The authors show that firms differ in their subsets of dynamic capabilities for pursuing different types of inter-organizational, boundary-spanning relationships (such as alliances vs broader network relationships), which ultimately affects their innovation performance.,The authors contribute to the growing body of work on dynamic capabilities and firm-specific advantages by unbundling the dynamic capability subsets, and investigating their complex interdependencies for managing different types of inter-organizational linkages. The main new insight is that the “linear model” of generating more innovations through higher inter-firm collaboration in an emerging field paints an erroneous picture of how high innovation performance is actually achieved.

[1]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives , 2007 .

[2]  A. Rugman,et al.  Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives , 2003 .

[3]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Nature of Partnering Experience and the Gains from Alliances , 2009 .

[4]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Contradictory or compatible? reconsidering the “trade-off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing , 2008 .

[5]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[6]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[7]  P. Puranam,et al.  What They Know vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions , 2007 .

[8]  Mahka Moeen,et al.  A Two-Sided Matching Approach for Partner Selection and Assessing Complementarities in Partners’ Attributes in Inter-Firm Alliances , 2014 .

[10]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  The role of international assignees' social capital in creating inter-unit intellectual capital: A cross-level model , 2009 .

[11]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology , 2007, 0911.2982.

[12]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[14]  A. Goerzen,et al.  Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships , 2007 .

[15]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[16]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[17]  John Jianjun Zhu,et al.  Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy , 2018 .

[18]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures , 2004 .

[19]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy , 2016 .

[20]  Laura M. Fernández-Méndez,et al.  Domestic political connections and international expansion: It's not only ‘who you know’ that matters , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[21]  Andrew Hess,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation , 2014 .

[23]  David J. Teece,et al.  Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory , 2018, Journal of Management & Organization.

[24]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Intended and unintended termination of international joint ventures , 2007 .

[25]  David J. Teece,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action , 2012 .

[26]  Vivek Tandon,et al.  1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation , 2008 .

[27]  Mark Strom,et al.  Model of Co-Development Emerges , 2002 .

[28]  Alan M. Rugman,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities of Multinational Enterprises: The Dominant Logics Behind Sensing, Seizing, and Transforming Matter! , 2018 .

[29]  Julían Andrés,et al.  La gestión del conocimiento y su influencia en las capacidades dinámicas: Contrastación empírica en Empresas Colombianas Intensivas en uso de conocimiento , 2020 .

[30]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Manuel E. Sosa Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[32]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[33]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[34]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Catching the wave: alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks , 1997 .

[35]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[36]  Lasse B. Lien,et al.  Relatedness and Acquirer Performance , 2006 .

[37]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[38]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Sub‐National Institutional Contingencies, Network Positions, and IJV Partner Selection , 2012 .

[39]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[40]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[41]  Benjamin L. Hallen The Causes and Consequences of the Initial Network Positions of New Organizations: From Whom Do Entrepreneurs Receive Investments? , 2008 .

[42]  J. C. Pinho,et al.  The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance , 2016 .

[43]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[44]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance , 2005 .

[45]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages , 2005 .

[46]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[48]  S. Park,et al.  Firm Resources as Moderators of the Relationship Between Market Growth and Strategic Alliances in Semiconductor Start-UPS , 2002 .

[49]  E. Maitland,et al.  Managerial cognition and internationalization , 2015 .

[50]  M. Golonka Proactive cooperation with strangers: Enhancing complexity of the ICT firms' alliance portfolio and their innovativeness , 2015 .

[51]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Challenges of Building Theory by Combining Lenses , 2011 .

[52]  C. Phelps A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[53]  J. Hennart,et al.  Structural determinants of joint venture performance , 2005 .

[54]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF UNOBSERVABLES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[55]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[56]  Balagopal Vissa,et al.  A Matching Theory of Entrepreneurs ’ Tie Formation Intentions and Initiation of Economic Exchange , 2010 .

[57]  Bradley R. Barnes,et al.  A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals , 2016 .

[58]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Partner Selection in R&D Alliances , 2008 .

[59]  Melanie Schreiner,et al.  What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success , 2009 .

[60]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[61]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners , 2005 .

[62]  J. Siegel,et al.  Contingent Political Capital and International Alliances: Evidence from South Korea , 2007 .

[63]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[64]  C. Helmers,et al.  Do Board Interlocks Increase Innovation? Evidence from a Corporate Governance Reform in India , 2017 .

[65]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[66]  R. Parente,et al.  STRATEGIC MODULARITY AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF MULTINATIONAL FIRM , 2013 .

[67]  S. Haugland,et al.  Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis , 2008 .

[68]  Andrea Mantovani,et al.  Equilibrium Innovation Ecosystems: The Dark Side of Collaborating with Complementors , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[69]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality and the Relationship between Structural Holes and Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field , 2011 .

[71]  Antonio Capaldo Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[72]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships , 2011 .

[73]  W. H. Hoffmann Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances , 2007 .

[74]  L. Tihanyi,et al.  Knowledge Dependence and the Formation of Director Interlocks , 2017 .

[75]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Local Partnering in Foreign Ventures: Uncertainty, Experiential Learning, and Syndication in Cross-Border Venture Capital Investments , 2016 .

[76]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[77]  D. Teece A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise , 2014 .

[78]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances , 1997 .

[79]  P. Barr,et al.  Environmental Context, Managerial Cognition, and Strategic Action: An Integrated View , 2008 .

[80]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources , 2007 .

[81]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[82]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm‐level alliance success , 2007 .

[83]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[84]  Alice Lam,et al.  Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK* , 2003 .

[85]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances , 2002 .

[86]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[87]  M. Nippa,et al.  On the future of international joint venture research , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[88]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs , 2011, Organ. Sci..