An environment for managing software development processes

Considerable efforts have been undertaken to construct environments supporting dynamic software processes. The road to success neither takes us into the runtime stack of the process engine (rule-based approaches), nor may we tolerate the straight-jacket of a static Petri net. We propose an environment centered around dynamic task nets, which provide project managers with all details required to plan, analyse, and monitor software projects, taking into account changes to the product structure, feedbacks, simultaneous engineering, and replanning of resource assignments. Developers benefit from the management of dynamic work contents, including control over incoming versions of input documents and intermediate releases of output documents. The environment is based on a formal specification as a graph rewriting system, which allows for describing editing, analysis, and enactment of task nets in a uniform formal framework. By generating code from the specification, we avoid the cumbersome and error-prone task of translating complex graph transformations manually into a low-level programming language.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  Claude Godart,et al.  ALF: a framework for building process-centred software engineering environments , 1994 .

[3]  John K. Ousterhout,et al.  Tcl and the Tk Toolkit , 1994 .

[4]  Reidar Conradi,et al.  EPOS: object-oriented cooperative process modelling , 1994 .

[5]  Gail E. Kaiser,et al.  Extending a Tool Integration Language , 1991, Proceedings. First International Conference on the Software Process,.

[6]  Manfred Nagl,et al.  A universal component for the administration in distributed and integrated development environments , 1994 .

[7]  M. L. Kellner,et al.  Software Process Modeling Support for Management Planning and Control , 1991, Proceedings. First International Conference on the Software Process,.

[8]  Volker Gruhn Managing software processes in the environment MELMAC , 1990 .

[9]  Andy Schürr,et al.  GRAS, a Graph-Oriented (Software) Engineering Database System , 1995, Inf. Syst..

[10]  Bernhard Westfechtel,et al.  A Graph-Based System for Managing Configurations of Engineering Design Documents , 1996, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[11]  Andy Schürr,et al.  Rapid Programming with Graph Rewrite Rules , 1994 .

[12]  Patrick Scott Chun Young Customizable process specification and enactment for technical and non-technical users , 1994 .

[13]  Wilhelm Schäfer,et al.  MERLIN: supporting cooperation in software development through a knowledge-based environment , 1994 .

[14]  Bernhard Westfechtel,et al.  A programmed graph rewriting system for software process management , 1995, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Gail E. Kaiser,et al.  Rule Chaining in Marvel: Dynamic Binding of Parameters , 1992, IEEE Expert.

[16]  Brian Warboys,et al.  The Software Process: Modelling and Technology , 1999, Software Process: Principles, Methodology, Technology.

[17]  C. Fernstrom,et al.  Process Weaver: adding process support to UNIX , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Software Process-Continuous Software Process Improvement.

[18]  Mark Dowson,et al.  Towards Requirements for Enactment Mechanisms , 1994, EWSPT.

[19]  Bernhard Westfechtel,et al.  DYNAMITE: DYNAMIc Task nEts for software process management , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[20]  Albert Zündorf,et al.  Graph Pattern Matching in PROGRES , 1994, TAGT.

[21]  Carlo Ghezzi,et al.  SPADE: an environment for software process analysis, design, and enactment , 1994 .

[22]  Andy Schürr,et al.  Graph Grammar Engineering with PROGRES , 1995, ESEC.

[23]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Process modeling , 1992, CACM.