Fish use of reef structures and adjacent sand flats: implications for selecting minimum buffer zones between new artificial reefs and existing reefs

: Artificial reefs are deployed worldwide to enhance fisheries. Placement of artificial reefs relative to nearby existing artificial and natural reefs can influence fish use of these structures, yet no quantitative guidelines exist for selecting optimal distances between new and existing reefs. Here, we documented fish abundance, biomass, species richness, community composition, and key environmental variables on 24 artificial and natural reefs with adjacent sand flats to infer minimum buffer distances around existing reefs where placement of new artificial reefs should be avoided. At each site, we surveyed 4 transects: one 30 m transect across reef structure and 3 consecutive 30 m transects of increasing distance from the reef across sand bottom. Fish abundance, biomass, and species richness were highest on reefs and progressively decreased across adjacent sand flats. Environmental variables influenced these community metrics, but patterns of fish habitat use persisted. Fish community composition shifted gradually from reefs across adjacent sand flats, with fish communities on reefs most dissimilar to communities on sand bottom farthest from the reefs. A minimum buffer of 60 m (30 m around existing reefs plus 30 m around new reefs) or 120 m (60 m plus 60 m) between reefs would encompass 77 and 97%, respectively, of fishes utilizing sand-bottom habitat around each reef. Future artificial reef deployment should maintain these minimum buffer zones between reefs to more effectively enhance fisheries by minimizing attraction of fishes from existing reefs, while also maximizing food resource availability for reef fishes and area for routine reef fish behaviors.

[1]  J. Hare,et al.  Native fish community structure and Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans densities along a depth-temperature gradient in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA , 2014 .

[2]  Orla Doherty,et al.  Digital Reef Rugosity Estimates Coral Reef Habitat Complexity , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  S. Szedlmayer,et al.  Home range and movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on artificial reefs , 2011 .

[4]  F. Félix-Hackradt,et al.  Influence of habitat structure on fish assemblage of an artificial reef in southern Brazil. , 2011, Marine environmental research.

[5]  J. Joyeux,et al.  Target fishes on artificial reefs: evidences of impacts over nearby natural environments. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  J. Osborne Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation , 2010 .

[7]  I. Zalmon,et al.  Fish responses to increasing distance from artificial reefs on the Southeastern Brazilian Coast , 2010 .

[8]  A. Parma,et al.  Influence of predatory reef fishes on the spatial distribution of Munida gregaria (=M. subrugosa) (Crustacea; Galatheidae) in shallow Patagonian soft bottoms , 2008 .

[9]  J. Valentine,et al.  Proximity to reef influences density of small predatory fishes, while type of seagrass influences intensity of their predation on crabs , 2007 .

[10]  A. Lombarte,et al.  Teleostean fish assemblages in an artificial reef and a natural rocky area in Catalonia (Northwestern Mediterranean): an ecomorphological approach , 2006 .

[11]  David S. Gilliam,et al.  Reef Fish Assemblage Structure Affected by Small-Scale Spacing and Size Variations of Artificial Patch Reefs , 2005 .

[12]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movement Patterns, Habitat Utilization, Home Range Size and Site Fidelity of Whitesaddle Goatfish, Parupeneus Porphyreus, In a Marine Reserve , 2000, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[13]  Donald L. Kramer,et al.  Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[14]  Nancy C. Burke Nocturnal foraging habitats of French and bluestriped grunts, Haemulon flavolineatum and H. sciurus, at Tobacco Caye, Belize , 1995, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[15]  J. C. Howe Artificial Reef Evaluation with Application to Natural Marine Habitats , 2003 .

[16]  T. Jorgensen,et al.  Spatio-temporal variations in gillnet catch rates in the vicinity of North Sea oil platforms , 2002 .

[17]  M. Baine,et al.  Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance , 2001 .

[18]  G. Rilov,et al.  Fish assemblage on natural versus vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective , 2000 .

[19]  R. Parker,et al.  Changes in a North Carolina Reef Fish Community after 15 Years of Intense Fishing—Global Warming Implications , 1998 .

[20]  R. D. Semlitsch Biological Delineation of Terrestrial Buffer Zones for Pond‐Breeding Salamanders , 1998 .

[21]  S. Bortone Resolving the Attraction-Production Dilemma in Artificial Reef Research: Some Yeas and Nays , 1998 .

[22]  S. Bortone,et al.  The impact of artificial‐reef fish assemblages on their potential forage area , 1998 .

[23]  C. Wilson,et al.  Seasonal and spatial variation in the abundance and size distribution of fishes associated with a petroleum platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico , 1997 .

[24]  Geoff Jones,et al.  Do Artificial Reefs Increase Regional Fish Production? A Review of Existing Data , 1997 .

[25]  J. Gibbons,et al.  Terrestrial Buffer Zones and Wetland Conservation: A Case Study of Freshwater Turtles in a Carolina Bay , 1995 .

[26]  R. Kurz Predator-prey interactions between gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus gmelin) and a guild of sand dollars around artificial reefs in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico , 1995 .

[27]  M. Posey,et al.  Effects of proximity to an offshore hard-bottom reef on infaunal abundances , 1994 .

[28]  James A. Bohnsack,et al.  EFFECTS OF REEF SIZE ON COLONIZATION AND ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE OF FISHES AT ARTIFICIAL REEFS OFF SOUTHEASTERN FLORIDA, U.S.A. , 1994 .

[29]  M. McGehee Correspondence between assemblages of coral reef fishes and gradients of water motion, depth, and substrate size off Puerto Rico , 1994 .

[30]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[31]  T. Frazer,et al.  Population effects of refuge dispersion for adult stone crabs (Xanthidae, Menippe) , 1990 .

[32]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Constraints Placed by Predators on Feeding Behaviour , 1986 .

[33]  R. B. Searles,et al.  Temporal and spatial patterns of growth and survival of invertebrate and algal populations of a North Carolina continental shelf community , 1984 .

[34]  P. Tester,et al.  South Atlantic bight reef fish communities as represented in hook-and-line catches , 1984 .

[35]  Robert A. Miller,et al.  Colonization by nearshore fish on small artificial reefs in Barkley Sound, British Columbia , 1981 .

[36]  Jr Manuel C. Molles,et al.  FISH SPECIES DIVERSITY ON MODEL AND NATURAL REEF PATCHES: EXPERIMENTAL INSULAR BIOGEOGRAPHY' , 1978 .

[37]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  The behavior of heterotypic resting schools of juvenile grunts (Pomadasyidae) , 1977 .

[38]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[40]  J. E. Randall,et al.  Grazing Effect on Sea Grasses by Herbivorous Reef Fishes in the West Indies , 1965 .

[41]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[42]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .