Imprinted X inactivation and reprogramming in the preimplantation mouse embryo.

X chromosome inactivation is a developmentally regulated process that causes one of the two X chromosomes in normal female mammals to become transcriptionally silenced, thus equalizing the expression of X-linked genes between the sexes. Such dosage compensation depends upon dynamic genetic and epigenetic events occurring very early in development. X inactivation is controlled by an X inactivation centre that is associated with the expression of non-coding RNAs required for the silencing. Also associated with the inactive X are repressive histone modifications and polycomb protein-mediated states, which are progressively acquired during the inactivation process. In mouse, two forms of X inactivation have been described. Random X inactivation happens in the derivatives of the inner cell mass (ICM) giving rise to embryos where the maternally inherited X(Xm) is inactive in some cells and the paternally derived X (Xp) is inactive in others. Random X inactivation occurs around the time of implantation. Imprinted X inactivation, the preferential inactivation of the Xp chromosome, occurs earlier and, although there has been some debate as to the precise timing of initiation of this event, is apparent in all cells early in preimplantation development, then is subsequently confined to the cells of the extraembryonic lineages. A picture is emerging whereby initial epigenetic asymmetry between the two parental X chromosomes is reprogrammed in a lineage specific manner resulting in a switch from imprinted to random inactivation in embryonic derivatives. Neither the underlying reason nor the full extent of these early lineage specific epigenetic changes is known, but they may be correlated with more genome-wide reprogramming events essential for normal development.

[1]  E. Li,et al.  Ring1b-mediated H2A Ubiquitination Associates with Inactive X Chromosomes and Is Involved in Initiation of X Inactivation* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Haruhiko Koseki,et al.  Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[3]  E. Li,et al.  Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting , 2004, Nature.

[4]  A. Ferguson-Smith X Inactivation: Pre- or Post-Fertilisation Turn-off? , 2004, Current Biology.

[5]  E. Li,et al.  De novo DNA methylation is dispensable for the initiation and propagation of X chromosome inactivation , 2004, Development.

[6]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Reactivation of the Paternal X Chromosome in Early Mouse Embryos , 2004, Science.

[7]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Epigenetic Dynamics of Imprinted X Inactivation During Early Mouse Development , 2004, Science.

[8]  E. Li,et al.  Role of de novo DNA methyltransferases in initiation of genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation. , 2004, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[9]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos , 2003, Nature.

[10]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[11]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[12]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[13]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Characterization and quantitation of differential Tsix transcripts: implications for Tsix function. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  B. Migeon,et al.  Species differences in TSIX/Tsix reveal the roles of these genes in X-chromosome inactivation. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  N. Brockdorff X-chromosome inactivation: closing in on proteins that bind Xist RNA. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Mitotically Stable Association of Polycomb Group Proteins Eed and Enx1 with the Inactive X Chromosome in Trophoblast Stem Cells , 2002, Current Biology.

[17]  M. Surani,et al.  Imprinting and the Epigenetic Asymmetry Between Parental Genomes , 2001, Science.

[18]  T B Nesterova,et al.  Characterization of the genomic Xist locus in rodents reveals conservation of overall gene structure and tandem repeats but rapid evolution of unique sequence. , 2001, Genome research.

[19]  E. Li,et al.  Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix. , 2001, Development.

[20]  P. Avner,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  P. Avner,et al.  Methylation profiles of DXPas34 during the onset of X-inactivation. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  J. Lee,et al.  Disruption of Imprinted X Inactivation by Parent-of-Origin Effects at Tsix , 2000, Cell.

[23]  M. Tada,et al.  Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth. , 2000, Development.

[24]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Targeted Mutagenesis of Tsix Leads to Nonrandom X Inactivation , 1999, Cell.

[25]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[26]  L. E. McDonald,et al.  Methylation analysis using bisulfite genomic sequencing: application to small numbers of intact cells. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[27]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. , 1997, Genes & development.

[28]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[29]  J. Mcneil,et al.  XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  P. Avner,et al.  Xce haplotypes show modified methylation in a region of the active X chromosome lying 3' to Xist. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Monk,et al.  Methylation of the mouse Xist gene in sperm and eggs correlates with imprinted Xist expression and paternal X–inactivation , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[32]  K. Latham,et al.  Expression of X-linked genes in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and normal mouse preimplantation embryos. , 1995, Developmental genetics.

[33]  H. Cedar,et al.  Gamete–specific methylation correlates with imprinting of the murine Xist gene , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[34]  S. Rastan,et al.  Evidence that random and imprinted Xist expression is controlled by preemptive methylation , 1994, Cell.

[35]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Expression of Xist during mouse development suggests a role in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation , 1993, Cell.

[36]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus , 1992, Cell.

[37]  N. Takagi,et al.  Correlation between X-chromosome inactivation and cell differentiation in female preimplantation mouse embryos. , 1985, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[38]  S. Gartler,et al.  Cytological evidence for an inactive X chromosome in murine oogonia. , 1980, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[39]  S. Gartler,et al.  HGPRT activity changes in preimplantation mouse embryos , 1978, Nature.

[40]  M. Sasaki,et al.  Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse , 1975, Nature.

[41]  A. Solari The behavior of the XY pair in mammals. , 1974, International review of cytology.

[42]  W. E. Poole,et al.  Phosphoglycerate kinase polymorphism in kangaroos provides further evidence for paternal X inactivation. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[43]  M. Lyon Gene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.) , 1961, Nature.