Methodological issues in MIS cross-cultural research

This paper presents a discussion of methodological issues that are relevant and idiosyncratic to cross-cultural research. One characteristic that typifies cross-cultural studies is their comparative nature, i.e., they involve a comparison across two separate cultures on a focal phenomenon. When differences across cultures are observed, the question arises as to whether the results are true cultural differences or merely measurement artifacts. Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research focus on ruling out alternative explanations for these differences and thus enhancing the interpretability of the results. The paper presents an overview of key methodological issues in cross-cultural research and reviews methods of preventing or detecting methodological problems.

[1]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[3]  T. Cleary,et al.  An Investigation of Item Bias , 1968 .

[4]  Inder P. Khera,et al.  Are Students Really Poor Substitutes for Businessmen in Behavioral Research? , 1970 .

[5]  Y. Poortinga.  Cross-cultural comparison of maximum performance tests : some methodological aspects and some experiments with simple auditory and visual stimuli , 1971 .

[6]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Methodological Problems of Comparative Research , 1976 .

[7]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[8]  Gerald M. Hampton,et al.  Students As Subjects in International Behavioral Studies , 1979 .

[9]  Michael J. Subkoviak,et al.  A Comparison of Several Methods of Assessing Item Bias. , 1979 .

[10]  Lawrence M. Rudner,et al.  A MONTE CARLO COMPARISON OF SEVEN BIASED ITEM DETECTION TECHNIQUES , 1980 .

[11]  F. Lord.  Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[12]  B. Plake.  A Comparison of a Statistical and Subjective Procedure to Ascertain Item Validity: One Step in the Test Validation Process , 1980 .

[13]  Comparison of Procedures for Detecting test-Item Bias with both Internal and External Ability Criteria , 1981 .

[14]  Extent of Overlap among Four Item Bias Methods , 1982 .

[15]  C. Ross,et al.  Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[16]  M. J. Kolen,et al.  The Reliability of Six Item Bias Indices , 1984 .

[17]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[18]  Neil J. Dorans,et al.  Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. , 1986 .

[19]  Dorothy T. Thayer,et al.  Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. , 1986 .

[20]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Explaining Cross-Cultural Differences , 1987 .

[21]  Y. Poortinga.  Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues. , 1989, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[22]  A. Meléis,et al.  Methodological issues in research with immigrants. , 1989, Medical anthropology.

[23]  G. Engelhard,et al.  Accuracy of Bias Review Judges in Identifying Differential Item Functioning on Teacher Certification Tests , 1990 .

[24]  R. Green,et al.  Cross-Cultural Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model , 1991 .

[25]  P. Holland,et al.  DIF DETECTION AND DESCRIPTION: MANTEL‐HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION1,2 , 1992 .

[26]  R. Lissitz,et al.  The Consistency of Detecting Item Bias Across Different Test Administrations: Implications of Another Failure , 1992 .

[27]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. , 1993 .

[28]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  R. Hambleton,et al.  The Effects of Score Group Width on the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. , 1994 .

[30]  R. Hambleton.  Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. , 1994 .

[31]  Michael R. Mullen.  Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[32]  Lisa Adent Hoecklin.  Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies For Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[33]  R. Serpell,et al.  Robert Serpell. The Significance of Schooling: Life-Journeys in an African Society . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. xv + 345 pp. Illustrations. Tables. Figures. Appendices. Chapter Notes. Bibliography. Index. Maps. $59.95. Cloth. , 1995, African Studies Review.

[34]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines , 1996 .

[35]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[36]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment , 1997 .