Composite system well-being evaluation based on non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract The reliability evaluation of composite power systems has historically been assessed using deterministic and probabilistic criteria and methods. The well-being approach was recently proposed in order to combine deterministic criteria with probabilistic methods and evaluates the system by healthy, marginal and risky states. This paper presents an efficient method for composite system well-being evaluation based on non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation. It is assumed that the system is coherent, and the frequency and duration indices are calculated by the conditional probability method. The system adequacy is evaluated by a non-linear power flow solved by the Newton–Raphson method and by an optimal power flow solved by the Interior Points method. Results are presented for the IEEE-RTS system with a constant load and with a variable load curve. It is demonstrated that the proposed method, as well as the assumed hypothesis, are valid and provide an efficient alternative for the well-being analysis of large scale power systems.

[1]  Roy Billinton Composite System Reliability Evaluation , 1969 .

[2]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Pseudo-chronological simulation for composite reliability analysis with time varying loads , 2000 .

[3]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Application of Monte Carlo simulation to generating system well-being analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[5]  R. Billinton,et al.  Bulk electric system well-being analysis using sequential Monte Carlo simulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  A. M. Leite da Silva,et al.  Evaluation of reliability worth in composite systems based on pseudo-sequential Monte Carlo simulation , 1994 .

[7]  R. Billinton,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of power systems , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  R. Billinton,et al.  Incorporating well-being considerations in generating systems using energy storage , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[9]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A hybrid model for quantifying different operating states of composite power systems , 1992 .

[10]  A.M.L. da Silva,et al.  Well-being analysis for composite generation and transmission systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  N. J. Balu,et al.  Composite generation/transmission reliability evaluation , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Analysis of Coherent Multistate Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A security based approach to composite power system reliability evaluation , 1992 .

[14]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A basic framework for generating system operating health analysis , 1994 .

[15]  Djalma M. Falcao,et al.  Composite reliability evaluation by sequential Monte Carlo simulation on parallel and distributed processing environments , 2001 .

[16]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A system state transition sampling method for composite system reliability evaluation , 1993 .

[17]  A. M. Leite da Silva,et al.  A conditional probability approach to the calculation of frequency and duration indices in composite reliability evaluation , 1993 .

[18]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Unit commitment health analysis for interconnected systems , 1997 .

[19]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Optimal Scheduling of Spinning Reserve Based on Well-Being Model , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Probability Subcommittee,et al.  IEEE Reliability Test System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[21]  L. Goel,et al.  Well-being framework for composite generation and transmission system reliability evaluation , 1999 .

[22]  A. M. Leite da Silva,et al.  Frequency and duration calculations in composite generation and transmission reliability evaluation , 1992 .

[23]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Composite power system health analysis using a security constrained adequacy evaluation procedure , 1994 .