Foveal splitting causes differential processing of Chinese orthography in the male and female brain.

Chinese characters contain separate phonetic and semantic radicals. A dominant character type exists in which the semantic radical is on the left and the phonetic radical on the right; an opposite, minority structure also exists, with the semantic radical on the right and the phonetic radical on the left. We show that, when asked to pronounce isolated tokens of these two character types, males responded significantly faster when the phonetic information was on the right, whereas females showed a non-significant tendency in the opposite direction. Recent research on foveal structure and reading suggests that the two halves of a centrally fixated character are initially processed in different hemispheres. The male brain typically relies more on the left hemisphere for phonological processing compared with the female brain, causing this gender difference to emerge. This interaction is predicted by an implemented computational model. This study supports the existence of a gender difference in phonological processing, and shows that the effects of foveal splitting in reading extend far enough into word recognition to interact with the gender of the reader in a naturalistic reading task.

[1]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception , 2004, Brain and Language.

[2]  Janet H. Hsiao,et al.  Differences of Split and Non-Split Architectures Emerged from Modelling Chinese Character Pronunciation , 2005 .

[3]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives , 1989 .

[4]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Connectionsit modelling of surface dyslexia based on foveal splitting: Impaired pronunciation after only two hlaf pints , 2001 .

[5]  Kenji Kansaku,et al.  Sex difference in language lateralization may be task-dependent. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in the normal lateralization of the supratemporal cortex: MRI surface-rendering morphometry of Heschl's gyrus and the planum temporale. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[8]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Morphometry of the Sylvian fissure and the corpus callosum, with emphasis on sex differences. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[10]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations , 2004 .

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Cognitive gender differences: Where are they, and why are they there? , 1996 .

[13]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Talking Difference: On Gender and Language , 1995 .

[15]  Connectionist modelling of surface dyslexia based on foveal splitting: Impaired pronunciation after only two half pints , .

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Kenji Kansaku,et al.  Imaging studies on sex differences in the lateralization of language , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[18]  Jeffrey Coney,et al.  Lateral Asymmetry in Phonological Processing: Relating Behavioral Measures to Neuroimaged Structures , 2002, Brain and Language.

[19]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry and corpus callosum morphometry: a magnetic resonance imaging study , 2000, Neuroscience Research.

[20]  N. Henley Molehill or Mountain? What We Know and Don’t Know About Sex Bias in Language , 1989 .

[21]  D. Voyer,et al.  On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. , 1996, Laterality.

[22]  K. P. George,et al.  Cortical language lateralization in right handed normal subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[23]  Janet H. Hsiao,et al.  Connectionist modelling of Chinese character pronunciation based on foveal splitting , 2004 .

[24]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  E. Lambe Dyslexia, gender, and brain imaging , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  H. Lubs,et al.  Gender differences in the severity of adult familial dyslexia , 1995 .

[27]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[28]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[29]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  Language processing in Chinese , 1992 .

[30]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The nature of foveal representation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  S. Galetta,et al.  The central visual field in homonymous hemianopia. Evidence for unilateral foveal representation. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[33]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. , 2000, Psychological review.

[34]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  André Aleman,et al.  Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  J. Inglis,et al.  Sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence. , 1981, Science.

[37]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[38]  S. F. Witelson,et al.  Sylvian fissure morphology and asymmetry in men and women: Bilateral differences in relation to handedness in men , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  C. Hue Recognition Processes in Character Naming , 1992 .