Zeno Meets Modern Science

“No one has ever touched Zeno without refuting him”. We will not refute Zeno in this paper. Instead we review some unexpected encounters of Zeno with modern science. The paper begins with a brief biography of Zeno of Elea followed by his famous paradoxes of motion. Reflections on continuity of space and time lead us to Banach and Tarski and to their celebrated paradox, which is in fact not a paradox at all but a strict mathematical theorem, although very counterintuitive. Quantum mechanics brings another flavour in Zeno paradoxes. Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects are really paradoxical but now experimental facts. Then we discuss supertasks and bifurcated supertasks. The concept of localisation leads us to Newton and Wigner and to interesting phenomenon of quantum revivals. At last we note that the paradoxical idea of timeless universe, defended by Zeno and Parmenides at ancient times, is still alive in quantum gravity. The list of references that follows is necessarily incomplete but we hope it will assist interested reader to fill in details.

[1]  Routledge,et al.  Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 1998 .

[2]  W. Zawadzki,et al.  Zitterbewegung and its effects on electrons in semiconductors , 2004, cond-mat/0411488.

[3]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[4]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[5]  R. W. Robinett.  Quantum wave packet revivals , 2004 .

[6]  John L. Bell.  The Art of the Intelligible: An Elementary Survey of Mathematics in Its Conceptual Development , 2001 .

[7]  C. Ross.  Found , 1869, The Dental register.

[8]  Hans Halvorson.  Locality, Localization, and the Particle Concept: Topics in the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory , 2001 .

[9]  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1965, Nature.

[10]  E. Álvarez,et al.  Quantum Gravity , 2004, gr-qc/0405107.

[11]  R. Kapp.  British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1950, Nature.

[12]  S. J. Summers.  On the Stone — von Neumann Uniqueness Theorem and Its Ramifications , 2001 .

[13]  Claus Kiefer,et al.  Decoherence: Concepts and examples , 1999 .

[14]  Jonathan Rosenberg,et al.  A Selective History of the Stone-von Neumann Theorem , 2003 .

[15]  C. Isham.  Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time , 1992, gr-qc/9210011.

[16]  Craig Callender,et al.  Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale , 2001 .

[17]  B. M. Fulk.  MATH , 1992 .

[18]  J. Earman.  Determinism: What We Have Learned and What We Still Don’t Know , 2004 .

[19]  John D. Norton,et al.  Infinite pains: the trouble with supertasks , 1996 .

[20]  A. Grünbaum.  Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes , 1968 .

[21]  F. Su.  The Banach-Tarski Paradox , 1990 .

[22]  Slava G. Turyshev,et al.  Lunar Laser Ranging Science , 2004 .

[23]  MATHEMATICS OF THE QUANTUM ZENO EFFECT , 2003, math-ph/0307044.

[24]  Wesley C. Salmon,et al.  Zeno's Paradoxes, , 1970 .

[25]  R. Westervelt,et al.  Zitterbewegung of electronic wave packets in semiconductor nanostructures , 2004, cond-mat/0410321.

[26]  R. Persaud.  Philosophy of science , 1992, The Lancet.

[27]  Florian Cajori.  The History of Zeno's Arguments on Motion , 1915 .

[28]  D. Hubin,et al.  THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY , 2004 .

[29]  A. Rex,et al.  Maxwell's demon 2: entropy, classical and quantum information, computing , 2002 .

[30]  Karel V. Kuchař,et al.  TIME AND INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM GRAVITY , 2011 .

[31]  M. López-Corredoira.  What do astrophysics and the world's oldest profession have in common? , 2003, astro-ph/0310368.

[32]  Marion Kee,et al.  Analysis , 2004, Machine Translation.

[33]  C. Isham,et al.  Spacetime and the Philosophical Challenge of Quantum Gravity , 2001 .

[34]  N. Mavromatos,et al.  LECT NOTES PHYS , 2002 .

[35]  Diogenes Laertius,et al.  The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers , 1853 .