Performance evaluation of gesture-based interaction between different age groups using Fitts' Law

The recent advances made in human-computer interaction have allowed us to manipulate digital contents exploiting recognition-based technologies. However, no work has been reported that evaluates how these interfaces influence the performance of different user groups. With the appearance of multiple sensors and controllers for hand gesture recognition, it becomes important to understand if these groups have similar performance levels concerning gestural interaction, and if some sensors could induce better results than others when dealing with users of different age brackets. In this respect, it could also be important to realize if the device's sensor accuracy in terms of hand / full body recognition influences interaction performance. We compare two gesture-sensing devices (Microsoft Kinect and Leap Motion) using Fitts' law to evaluate target acquisition performances, with relation to users' age differences. In this article, we present the results of an experiment implemented to compare the groups' performance using each of the devices and also realize which one could yield better results. 60 subjects took part in this study and they were asked to select 50 targets on the screen as quickly and accurately as possible using one of the devices. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of performance between the groups in the selection task. On the other hand, users' performance showed to be rather consistent when comparing both devices side by side in each group of users, which may imply that the device itself does not influence performance but actually the type of group does.

[1]  Luís Magalhães,et al.  Different interaction paradigms for different user groups: an evaluation regarding content selection , 2014, Interacción '14.

[2]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, Third Edition , 2012 .

[4]  Frank Weichert,et al.  Analysis of the Accuracy and Robustness of the Leap Motion Controller , 2013, Sensors.

[5]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Noncommand user interfaces , 1993, CACM.

[6]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[7]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[8]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  A New Derivation and Dataset for Fitts ’ Law of Human Motion , 2012 .

[9]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them) , 2004 .

[10]  Alexander H. Waibel,et al.  Multimodal interfaces , 1996, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[11]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Tablet, gestures, remote control?: influence of age on performance and user experience with iTV applications , 2014, TVX.

[12]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law , 1999, CHI '99.

[14]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks-on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Andries van Dam,et al.  Post-WIMP user interfaces , 1997, CACM.

[16]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Brett Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of gestural, touch, and mouse interaction with Fitts' law , 2013, OZCHI.

[18]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Age-related differences in pointing movements in restricted visual tasks and their design implication , 2013, 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[19]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[21]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Experimental evaluation of vision and speech based multimodal interfaces , 2001, PUI '01.

[22]  Junsong Yuan,et al.  Robust hand gesture recognition with kinect sensor , 2011, ACM Multimedia.

[23]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input , 2013, CHI.

[24]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..